A Scoping Review of Serial Homicide Geographic Mobility Literature and Four Typologies

AuthorCaroline V. Comerford
DOI10.1177/1088767921993506
Published date01 May 2022
Date01 May 2022
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767921993506
Homicide Studies
2022, Vol. 26(2) 148 –175
© 2021 SAGE Publications
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1088767921993506
journals.sagepub.com/home/hsx
Articles
A Scoping Review of Serial
Homicide Geographic
Mobility Literature and
Four Typologies
Caroline V. Comerford1
Abstract
The study of geographic mobility through geospatial analysis and journey-to-crime
approaches has made progress in environmental criminology, finding most offenders
commit crime close to their residence. However, extant literature on serial homicide
and geographic mobility is scarce, specifically lacking a comprehensive appraisal of
relative research. To gain a better understanding of the geographic mobility patterns
of serial homicide offenders, we must determine the current status of literature in this
area, to figure out where to go in terms of future research. Therefore, the following
study is a scoping review of existing literature on geographic mobility and serial
homicide and four associated typologies (Holmes & DeBurger’s Geographic typology,
Hickey’s Mobility typology, Canter’s Circle typology, and Rossmo’s Hunting Style
typology) to achieve the following: (1) Comprehensively evaluate literature regarding
serial homicide geographic mobility and four associated typologies to establish the
current status of research; (2) uncover potential literature gaps; and (3) provide
future research recommendations. Literature sources (N = 43) on serial homicide
and geographic mobility (1985–2018) were examined. While findings recognize the
relevance of mobility functions in serial homicide investigations, gaps in literature
were evident regarding serial homicide geographic mobility and the four associated
typologies. Findings also reveal that systematic research in this field is limited. Policy
implications and future research recommendations are discussed.
Keywords
serial killers, geospatial analysis, journey-to-crime, scoping review, typologies, mobility
patterns
1Florida International University, Miami, USA
Corresponding Author:
Caroline V. Comerford, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33199-0001, USA.
Email: ccome011@fiu.edu
993506HSXXXX10.1177/1088767921993506Homicide StudiesComerford
research-article2021
Comerford 149
Environmental criminology plays a pivotal role in further understanding situational
and environmental factors related to crime. Geospatial analysis (hereafter, GSA) and
journey-to- crime (henceforth, JTC) are well-documented analytical approaches in
environmental criminology predominantly concerned with geographic mobility pat-
terns of criminals (Canter & Larkin, 1993; LeBeau, 1992). Prior research suggests
serial offenders have similar offending processes, crime patterns, and spatial charac-
teristics, which may be applicable to all types of serial crime (Canter, 2003; Goodwill
& Alison, 2005; Rossmo, 1995a). While various studies have utilized GSA and/or JTC
to examine serial crime, research related to serial homicide geographic mobility is
scarce and lacks a comprehensive appraisal of the existing literature.
Four prominent geographic mobility typologies were also included in this appraisal
of the existing geographic mobility literature: (1) Holmes and DeBurger’s Geographic
typology; (2) Hickey’s Mobility typology; (3) Canter and Larkin’s Circle typology; and
(4) Rossmo’s Hunting typology. All four typologies include components concerning the
geographic mobility patterns of serial killers (i.e., geographically stable, transient, or
mixed journey-to-crime patterns). The reason all four typologies were reviewed in this
study is because they are the most prominent geographic mobility typologies in serial
homicide literature concerning the geospatial patterns of serial killers.
Therefore, the following study is a scoping review of existing literature on geo-
graphic mobility and serial homicide and by extension four associated mobility typol-
ogies well-documented in serial crime research to achieve the following: (1)
Comprehensively review existing literature regarding serial homicide geographic
mobility and four associated typologies to establish the current status of research; (2)
uncover potential literature gaps; and (3) provide future research recommendations to
further strengthen and develop literature in this area. To achieve these objectives, the
following scoping review was conducted to answer three primary research questions:
1. What do we know about geographic mobility (i.e., GSA and JTC) and serial
homicide?
2. What do we know about the following serial homicide geographic mobility
typologies: Holmes and DeBurger’s typology, Hickey’s typology, Canter’s
typology, and Rossmo’s typology?
3. What (if any) are the gaps in existing literature regarding serial homicide, geo-
graphic mobility patterns, and the four above-listed typologies?
Literature Review
The phenomenon of serial homicide, while considered statistically rare, is undeniably
existent. One of the primary difficulties in researching serial homicide is accurately
quantifying its occurrence. While considered uncommon, evidence suggests serial
homicide may be more frequent than previously specified (Hickey, 2013; Quinet,
2007). As Hickey (2013) noted, “we can never know for sure the actual number of
serial killers” (p. 41). While there continues to be a contentious debate regarding the
quantification of serial homicide, the geographic mobility patterns of serial murderers
provide the primary context for the following literature review.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT