Romantic (In)Justice: Criminal-Legal System-Impacted Black Women’s Romantic Relationship Status and Quality

AuthorAllison E. Monterrosa
DOI10.1177/15570851211019472
Published date01 October 2021
Date01 October 2021
Subject MatterArticles
2021, Vol. 16(4) 424 –446
https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211019472
Feminist Criminology
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/15570851211019472
journals.sagepub.com/home/fcx
Article
Romantic (In)Justice:
Criminal-Legal System-
Impacted Black Women’s
Romantic Relationship Status
and Quality
Allison E. Monterrosa1
Abstract
This study of working class, heterosexual, criminal-legal system-impacted Black women
described the women’s romantic histories and current romantic relationship statuses
in terms of commitment, exclusivity, and perceived quality. Using intersectional
research methods, qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 Black women
between the ages of 18 and 65 years who were working class, resided in Southern
California, and were impacted by the criminal-legal system. Data were analyzed using
an intersectional Black feminist criminological framework and findings revealed six
types of relationship statuses. These relationship statuses did not live up to the
women’s aspirations and yielded disparate levels of emotional and psychological
strain across relationship statuses.
Keywords
women and social policy, justice goals, intersections of race/class/gender, intimate
partner violence, romantic precarity
Intimacy can be achieved through various types of interpersonal relationships, includ-
ing romantic relationships. While romantic intimacy is framed as a personal matter, it
is also a political phenomenon. Indeed, scholars and social justice activists have often
argued that the personal is political (Combahee River Collective, 1974; Crenshaw,
1989; Freire, 1970; Hill Collins, 1989; hooks, 1981; Lorde, 1977; Mills, 1959; Moraga
1University of California, Riverside, USA
Corresponding Author:
Allison E. Monterrosa, Department of Sociology, University of California Riverside, 900 University Way,
Riverside, CA 92521-9800, USA.
Email: amont037@ucr.edu
1019472
FCXXXX10.1177/15570851211019472Feminist CriminologyMonterrosa
research-article
2021
Monterrosa 425
2 Feminist Criminology 00(0)
& Anzaldúa, 2015; Taylor, 2017). In this article, I center romantic relationships as a
unit of analysis due to the political and social power, as well as the economic implica-
tions, they yield within our society. Romantic partnerships are viewed as sites of power
relations, as they reflect hierarchies within the broader society (Oswin & Olund,
2010). Romantic couplings produce direct rewards, including increased social capital
and wealth-building opportunities (Carby, 1987; Cohen, 2005). Access to or exclusion
from intimacy has a multitude of structural and individual outcomes, including per-
sonal welfare, community attachment, sexual sociality, and health and socioeconomic
impacts (Hutson et al., 2018).
This study adds to intersectional understandings of racialized and gendered inequi-
ties by focusing on intimacy in the form of romantic relationships involving Black
women who are criminal-legal system-impacted. The term “system-impacted” refers
to “those who have been incarcerated, those with arrests/convictions but no incarcera-
tion and those who have been directly impacted by a loved one being incarcerated”
(Underground Scholars Language Guide, 2019, p. 1). The intimate sphere is a site of
“privileged institutions of social reproduction, the accumulation and transfer of capi-
tal, and self-development” (Berlant & Warner, 1998, p. 553). Access to romantic inti-
macy is governed by social forces stratified by race, class, gender, sexuality, and
various social identities which function to perpetuate hierarchies of power, dictating
who has access to participate and which types of benefits might be afforded from par-
ticipation (Hutson et al., 2018; Oswin & Olund, 2010). As such, focusing on romantic
intimacy is a social justice project that seeks to highlight injustice in the intimate
sphere to promote equitable access to romantic relationships and the benefits of inti-
macy that those relationships may provide. By providing data on the ways in which
criminal-legal system-impacted Black women perceive their access to romantic part-
nerships, this study fills the gap in knowledge of romantic relationship inequities as
viewed through lived experiences. Furthermore, the intersectional framework used in
this study allows for an examination of Black women’s relationships to broader power
structures (Crenshaw, 1989; Hull et al., 1982). The concept of intersectionality was
borne out of critical race theory, a legal theory revealing the ways in which racial dis-
crimination is embedded within the law (Bell, 1995; Crenshaw et al., 1995). Crenshaw
expands this analysis to include the multiple marginalized identities of race and gen-
der, with specific reference to Black women and antidiscrimination doctrine (Crenshaw,
1989).
Crenshaw argues, “the civil rights constituency cannot afford to view antidiscrimi-
nation doctrine as a permanent pronouncement of society’s commitment to ending
racial subordination. Rather, antidiscrimination law represents an ongoing ideological
struggle in which the occasional winners harbor the moral, coercive, consensual power
of law. Nonetheless, the victories it offers can be ephemeral and the risks of engage-
ment substantial” (Crenshaw, 1988, p. 1335). The explanatory power of intersectional-
ity centers Black women’s unique positionality of being a part of both a stigmatized
racial and gender group, these categories are not mutually exclusive—they are recon-
stitutive (Crenshaw, 1989). Black women’s experiences are not the sum of race and
gender, but as Black women (Crenshaw, 1989). Applying this theoretical frame to the

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT