Reviewing the law reviews.

• Author: Youngdale, Elizabeth M.
• Position: Bibliography

This is a selective bibliography of current law review literature of interest to defense counsel. Main articles are identified by naming the author or authors. The designations "Note," "Casenote," etc. are as listed in the publication, with the authorship, if given, shown in parentheses. Symposiums are generally shown by title.

U.S. and International

DAMAGES

Leonard E. Gross, Objectives of Remedies: Damages, Equity and Restitution, 39 BRANDEIS L.J. 529 (2001). Brandeis Law Journal, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292

Catharine Goodwin, Reconsideration of the Economic "Loss" Tables: Time for Meaningful Reform, 9 GEO. MASON L. REV. 91 (2000). George Mason Law Review, George Mason University School of Law, 3401 N, Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201-4498.

Michael B. Kelly, The Phantom Reliance Interest in Tort Damages, 38 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 169 (2001).

David W. Barnes, Remedies for Imperfect Transactions in Contracts and Tons, 38 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 193 (2001). San Diego Law Review, University of San Diego School of Law, 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110.

Consequential Damages: Hadley v. Baxendale under the Uniform Commercial Code, 54 SMU L. REV. 655 (2001).

Roy Ryden Anderson, Of Hidden Agendas, Naked Emperors, and a Few Good Soldiers: The Conference's Reach of Promise Regarding Article 2 Damage Remedies, 54 SMU L. REV. 795 (2001). SMU Law Review, Southern Methodist University School of Law, Dallas, TX 75275.

Comment (Eugene Kontorovich), The Mitigation of Emotional Distress Damages, 68 U. CHI. L. REV. 491 (2001). University of Chicago Law Review, University of Chicago Law School, 1111 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637.

Note (Charles A. Neff), Damages in Consumer Transactions under the Uniform Commercial Code's Revised Article 9-626(b): Loud Lawyers, Silent Statutes, and a Way Out of the Woods, 87 VA. L. REV. 1441 (2001). Virginia Law Review Association, 580 Massie Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903-1789.

EVIDENCE

Eleanor Swift, One Hundred Years of Evidence Law Reform: Thayer's Triumph, 88 CAL. L. REV. 2437 (2000). California Law Review, 592 Simon Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.

David A. Schum, Alternative Views of Argument Construction from a Mass of Evidence, 22 CARDOZO L. REV. 1461 (2001).

Ron A. Shapira, Saving Desdemona, 22 CARDOZO L. REV. 1771 (2001).

Craig R. Callen, Othello Could Not Optimize: Economics, Hearsay, and Less Adversary Systems, 22 CARDOZO L. REV. 1791 (2001). Cardozo Law Review, 55 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003-4391.

Note (Adam J. Siegel), Setting Limits on Judicial Scientific, Technical, and Other Specialized Fact-finding in the New Millennium, 86 CORNELL L. REV. 167 (2000). Cornell Law Review, Cornell Law School, Myron Taylor Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-4901.

Note (Christopher Y. Chert), Rethinking the Direct Evidence Requirement: A Suggested Approach in Analyzing Mixed-motives Discrimination Claims, 86 CORNELL L. REV. 899 (2001). Cornell Law Review, Cornell Law School, Myron Taylor Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-4901.

Donald McFarland, Present Sense Impressions Cannot Live in the Past, 28 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 907 (2001). Florida State University Law Review, College of Law, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1034.

Justin P. Murphy, Expert Witnesses at Trial: Where Are the Ethics? 14 GEO. J. LEGAL ETHICS 217 (2000). Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001.

Sofia Adrogue and Alan Ratliff, Kicking the Tires after Kumho: The Bottom Line on Admitting Financial Expert Testimony, 37 Hous. L. REV. 431 (2000).

Jean Macchiaroli Eggen, Clinical Medical Evidence of Causation in Toxic Tort Cases: Into the Crucible of Daubert, 38 Hous. L. REV. 369 (2001). Houston Law Review, University of Houston Law Center, Houston, TX 77204-6391.

Daniel R. Murray and Timothy J. Chorvat, Stepping Up to the Next Level: From the UETA to the URE and Beyond, 37 IDAHO L. REV. 415 (2001). Idaho Law Review, University of Idaho College of Law, Moscow, ID 83844-2321.

Todd E. Pettys, Evidentiary Relevance, Morally Reasonable Verdicts, and Jury Nullification, 86 IOWA L. REV. 467 (2001).

Note (Christopher J. Douglass), Objections, Renewals, and Preemptive Introductions: Erasing Uncertainty by Revisiting FRE 103, 86 Iowa L. REV. 949 (2001). Iowa Law Review, University of Iowa College of Law, Boyd Law Building, Room 190, Melrose and Byington, Iowa City, IA 52242-1113.

Note (Xavier Pena), The Effective Evaluation of Expert Reliability, 20 REV. LITIG. 743 (2001). Review of Litigation, 727 E. Dean Keeton St., Austin, TX 78705-3299.

D. Michael Risinger, Preliminary Thoughts on a Functional Taxonomy of Expertise for the Post-Kumho World, 31 SETON HALL L. REV. 508 (2000). Seton Hall Law Review, Seton Hall University School of Law, One Newark Center, Newark, NJ 07102.

Warren D. Wolfson, Evidence Advocacy: the Judge's Perspective, 31 STETSON L. REV. 35 (2001). Stetson Law Review, Stetson University College of Law, 1401 61st St. S., St. Petersburg, FL 33707-3299.

Frank Tuerkheimer, The Daubert Case and Its Aftermath: A Shot-gun Wedding of Technology and Law in the Supreme Court, 51 SYRACUSE L. REV. 803 (2001). Syracuse Law Review, Syracuse University College of Law, Syracuse, NY 13244-1030.

Lenora Ledwon, Diaries and Hearsay: Gender, Selfhood, and the Trustworthiness of Narrative Structure, 73 TEMP. L. REV. 1185 (2000).

Robert P. Burns, Notes on the Future of Evidence Law, 74 TEMP. L. REV. 69 (2001).

David M. Malone & Paul J. Zwier, Epistemology after Daubert, Kumho Tire, and the New Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 74 TEMP. L. REV. 103 (2001).

David Sonenshein...