Reviewing the Law Reviews.

• Author: Marino, Paul J.

This is a selective bibliography of current law review literature of interest to defense counsel. Main articles are identified by naming the author or authors. The designations "Note," "Comment," "Case Note," etc. are as listed in the publication, with the authorship, if given, shown in parentheses. Symposiums generally are shown by title.

U.S. and International

Damages

Scott L. Watson (Comment), Winstar Damages: Restitution Where Benefit Conferred on the Defendant Is Greater than Plaintiff's Out-of-Pocket Cost. 94 NV. U. L. REV. 305 (1999). Northwestern University Law Review, 357 E. Chicago Ave. Chicago, IL 60611.

Roderick J. Coffey (Comment), Fairness Is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Conflicting Interpretations of the Correct Measure of Damages for Breaches of Natural Gas Contracts Containing Take-or-Pay Provisions. 14 BYU J. PUB. L. 151 (1999). BYU Journal of Public Law, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Provo, UT 84602.

Joel Slawotsky, The Impropriety of Levying Punitive Damages on Innocent Successor Corporations. 38 DUQ. L. REV. 49-766 (1999). Duquesne Law Review, 132 Edward J. Hanley Hall, 900 Locust St., Pittsburgh, PA 15282.

David W. Barnes, The Net Expectation Interest in Contract Damages. 48 EMORY L.J. 1137 (1999). Emory Law Journal, Gambrell Hall, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Michael D. Moberly, Evolution in the Civil Rights Revolution: The Survival of Employment Discrimination Claims for Pain And Suffering. 17 HOFSTRA LAB. & EMP. L.J. 1(1999). Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal, Hofstra University School of Law, Hempstead, New York, NY 11550.

Jason P. Pogorelec (Note), Under What Circumstances Did Congress Intend to Award Punitive Damages for Victims of Unlawful Intentional Discrimination under Title VII? 40 B.C.L. REV. 1269 (1999). Boston College Law Review, 885 Centre St., Newton Centre, MA 02159.

Evidence

Robert A. Pikowsky, Privilege and Confidentiality of Attorney-client Communication via E-mail. 51 BAYLOR L. REV. 483 (1999). Baylor Law Review, 1400 S. Fifth St., Waco, TX 76706.

Amber Stevens (Comment), An Analysis of the Troubling Issues Surrounding In-house Counsel and the Attorney-client Privilege. 23 HAMLINE L. REV. 289(1999). Hamline Law Review, Hamline University School of Law, 1536 Hewitt Ave., St. Paul, MN 55104-1284.

Thomas M. Crowley, Help Me, Mr. Wizard, Can We really Have "Neutral" Rule 706 Experts? 1998 DEW. C. L. MICH. ST. U. L. REV. 927. Detroit College of Law Review, 130 E. Elizabeth St., Detroit, MI 48201.

Kimberly M. Hrabosky (Casenote), Stretching Daubert Beyond Recognition. 8 GEO. MASON U. L. REV. 203 (1999). Georgia Mason University Law Review, 3401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201.

Erica Beecher-Monas, A Ray of Light for Judges Blinded by Science: Triers of Science and Intellectual Due Process. 33 GA. L. REV. 1047 (1999). Georgia Law Review, University of Georgia School of Law, Athens, GA 30602.

Angela Conti & Brian Gitnik (Note), Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2): Problems with the Excited Utterance Exception to the Rule on Hearsay. 14 ST. JOHN'S J. LEGAL COMMENTARY 227 (1999). St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, Fromkes Hall, Grand Central and Utopia Parkways, Jamaica, NY 11439.

Brandon Jensen (Note), Litigating the Crossroads Between Sweet Home and Daubert. 24 VT. L. REV. 169 (1999). Vermont Law Review, Vermont Law School, South Royalton, VT 05068.

Edward J. Imwinkelried, The Escape Hatches from Frye and Daubert: Sometimes You Don't Need To Lay Either Foundation in Order to Introduce Expert Testimony. 23 AM. J. Avvoc. 1 (1999).

Thomas H. Neuckranz & Bradley C. Nahrstadt, Refuting Diagnostic and Neuropsychological Testing in Toxic Tort Cases. 23 AM. J. Avvoc. 19 (1999). American Journal of Trial Advocacy, Box 2263, Cumberland School of Law, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229.

Ethan A. Heinz (Comment), The Conflicting Mandates of FRE 412 and FRCP 26: Should Courts Allow Discovery of a Sexual Harassment Plaintiff's Sexual History? 1999 U. CHI. LEGAL F. 519.

Jayesh Shah (Comment), Limiting Expert Testimony about Sexual Harassment Policies, 1999 U. CHI. LEGAL F. 587.

Nathan P. Sutton (Comment), Waiver of Attorney-client and Work-product Privileges in Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment Cases. 1999 U. CHI. LEGAL F. 625. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1111 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637.

Michael H. Graham, The Expert Witness Predicament: Determining "Reliable" under the Gatekeeping Test of Daubert, Kumho, and Proposed Amended Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 54 U. MIAMI L. REV. 317 (2000). University of Miami Law Review, 349 Law Library, Coral Gables, FL 33124.

Michael J. Saks, The Aftermath of Daubert: An Evolving Jurisprudence of Expert Evidence. 40 JURISMETRICS J. 229 (2000). Jurismetrics Journal, American Bar Association, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611.

David Wadsworth (Casenote), Forma Scientific v. Biosera and the Admissibility of Evidence of Subsequent Remedial Measures in Strict Products Liability Actions. 71 U. COLO. L. REV. 757 (2000). University of Colorado Law Review, 290 Fleming Law Building, University of Colorado, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309.

Insurance

Rebecca M. Bratspies, Splitting the Baby: Apportioning Environmental Liability among Triggered Insurance Policies. 1999 BYU L. REV. 1215. Brigham Young University Law Review, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Provo, UT 84602.

Lorelie S. Masters, Punitive Damages: Covered or Not? 55 Bus. LAW. 283 (1999). Business Lawyer, Section of Business Law, American Bar Association, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611.

Mark A. Hall, Legal Rules and Industry Norms: The Impact of Laws Restricting Health Insurers' Use of Genetic Information. 40 JURISMETRICS J. 93 (1999). Jurismetrics Journal, American Bar Association, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611.

Joseph G. Manta & Christine N. Shultz, Y2K: Liability and Coverage Issues. 18 TEMP. ENVTL. L. &amp...