Restoring the missing context in HRM: Habitus, capital and field in the reproduction of Japanese repatriate careers
Author | Gareth Monteath,Leo McCann |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12279 |
Date | 01 November 2020 |
Published date | 01 November 2020 |
SPECIAL ISSUE
Restoring the missing context in HRM: Habitus,
capital and field in the reproduction of Japanese
repatriate careers
Leo McCann
1
| Gareth Monteath
2
1
The York Management School, University
of York
2
Link Global Solution, Inc
Correspondence
Leo McCann, The York Management School,
University of York, Freboys Lane, YO10 5GD,
York, UK.
Email: leo.mccann@york.ac.uk
Abstract
HRM literature often fails to adequately consider the
political-economic context that can strongly influence HR
practices and outcomes. This problem is particularly visible
as regards international careers. Notions such as “boundary-
less careers”privilege HR and employee agency and neglect
the complexity, variety, and importance of social structure
in influencing careers and constraining agency. Informed by
Bourdieu's theory of practice, this paper explores Japanese
HRM through the careers of repatriate managers. Through
in-depth and prolonged narrative inquiry, it documents the
powerful “forms of capital”that structure the “salaryman”
career field. Although tensions and conflicts existed—
notably in relation to gender—traditional “lifetime employ-
ment”careers remain powerful, highlighting the continued
centrality of capital and habitus in reproducing the Japanese
white-collar career field. We conclude by suggesting alter-
native ways of conceptualizing, researching, and portraying
white-collar careers within varied employment environ-
ments that are always shaped by specific and situated
contexts.
KEYWORDS
Bourdieu, careers, habitus, HRM in MNCs, Japanese
management, job security
Received: 27 May 2018 Revised: 8 November 2019 Accepted: 16 December 2019
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12279
478 © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Hum Resour Manag J. 2020;30:478–493.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/hrmj
Practitioner notes
What is currently known
•Much HRM research tends to ignore or downplay the importance of context and social structure
•This is often particularly true in literature on “wars for talent,”“boundaryless careers,”and internation-
ally mobile expert labour
•A decontextualized approach can exaggerate the agency of employees and HR managers/employing
organizations
What this paper adds
•This paper, based on the conceptual work of Pierre Bourdieu, takes a narrative inquiry approach to
studying the careers of Japanese corporate managers who have worked overseas and returned to Japan
•It reveals the depth and resilience of social structures that shape the behaviour, dispositions, and actions
of all persons employed in the Japanese white-collar corporate career field
•It demonstrates that Japanese repatriate managers are not as mobile or globally orientedas the “war for
talent”and “boundaryless careers”approach assumes
The implications for practitioners
•It is important to appreciate that all forms of employment relationship are embedded into wider social
structures that provide a context for both the employer and employee
•As an example of this, the article shows that highly traditional employment norms around loyalty, long
service, conformity, and gender difference remain the enduring features of Japanese white-collar
employment
•Proactive HR approaches to “managing”expatriation and repatriation might not be appropriate to all
employment contexts and career structures
1|INTRODUCTION
The employment landscape for white-collar expert work is routinely described in the following terms. We live in an
age of global labour markets and a “war for talent”(Michaels, Handfield-Jones, & Axelrod, 2001; Scullion, Collings, &
Caligiuri, 2010). Employers attempt to attract and retain “talent”that is in short supply as mobile high-value workers
leverage their powerful market positions in pursuing “boundaryless careers”(Arthur and Rousseau, 1996; Dickmann &
Doherty, 2010; Florida, 2012). Global labour markets operate within a broader context of unrelenting international
competition, driven by the short-term demands of financialization or “investor capitalism”(Dore, 2000; Dundon &
Rafferty, 2018). The war for talent perspective assumes a permissive environment where governmental, professional,
or union regulation of the employment relationship are increasingly feeble. Job security cannot exist in such a turbu-
lent environment, nor should any working person expect or even desire it. Expert workers in boundaryless careers
are in any case unconcerned with job insecurity. They possess a “global mindset”and are thereby accustomed to fric-
tionless movement and adaptation to new positions in any geographic environment. Although such fluidity and dis-
ruption can be a challenge for employers, the most informed, “strategic”and professional HR departments can
handle the complexities of boundaryless careers by recruiting and retaining high-value talent through “better man-
agement”of expatriation and repatriation processes that, ultimately, are always amenable to management control.
MCCANN AND MONTEATH 479
To continue reading
Request your trial