Responding to Racial Resentment: How Racial Resentment Influences Legislative Behavior

Date01 December 2020
Published date01 December 2020
DOI10.1177/1065912919857826
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919857826
Political Research Quarterly
2020, Vol. 73(4) 805 –818
© 2019 University of Utah
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1065912919857826
journals.sagepub.com/home/prq
Article
During President Barack Obama’s first State of the Union,
Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) broke with House rules of deco-
rum by yelling “You lie!” when the President said that his
health care policy would not cover those who illegally
immigrated to the United States. What is unique about this
is not that a member of the opposing party would disagree
or condemn the president. Rather, it was the undercurrent
of disrespect and de-legitimization of the nation’s first
black president in Wilson’s outburst that stood out as dis-
tinct from the criticism faced by past presidents. This was
not the first nor last time Obama’s legitimacy would be
questioned by Republican members of Congress. While
some may argue that this was politics as usual, to the for-
mer chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, Rep. G.K.
Butterfield (D-NC), the root of this behavior was clear:
I understand how government works and I know the
deference traditionally given to the president that you do not
see now [for President Obama]. You put all of these incidents
together—questioning his citizenship, the Muslim stuff, the
idea that he has been infected with anticolonists’ views by
his father he barely knew—and you have a strong
circumstantial case. It certainly smells like racism.1
The claim that the Obama presidency was viewed
through a racial lens is nothing new. Several studies
have convincingly shown that racial resentment among
the electorate not only shaped support of Obama but
also influenced support for policies closely associated
with him (Hutchings 2009; Kinder and Dale-Riddle
2012; Piston 2010; Tesler 2016; Tesler and Sears 2010).
In fact, we have long known that racial bias alters parti-
sanship and policy attitudes among the electorate
(Carmines and Stimson 1989; Edsall and Edsall 1992;
Gilens 1999; Key 1949; Kinder and Sanders 1996; Sears
1993; Winter 2008).
However, despite this robust scholarship, little is
known about how racial bias in the electorate shapes the
behavior of members of Congress. To fill this void, we
consider whether constituency attitudes influence the
press releases issued by legislators on racially tinged top-
ics, such as attacking the first black president. In answer-
ing these questions, we are able to gain greater insight
into the relationship between race and representation.
857826PRQXXX10.1177/1065912919857826Political Research QuarterlyGarcia and Stout
research-article2019
1Oberlin College, OH, USA
2Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA
Corresponding Author:
Jennifer R. Garcia, Department of Politics, Oberlin College, Room
216, Rice Hall, 10 N. Professor St., Oberlin, OH 44074, USA.
Email: Jennifer.Garcia@oberlin.edu
Responding to Racial Resentment:
How Racial Resentment Influences
Legislative Behavior
Jennifer R. Garcia1 and Christopher T. Stout2
Abstract
Despite the growing body of scholarship urging congressional scholars to consider the racialization of Congress,
little attention has been given to understanding how racial resentment impacts legislative behavior. To fill this gap,
we ask if and how racial resentment within a member’s home district influences the positions she takes on racially
tinged issues in her press releases. Due to constituent influence, we expect legislators from districts with high levels
of racial resentment to issue racially tinged press releases. Through an automated content analysis of more than fifty
four thousand press releases from almost four hundred U.S. House members in the 114th Congress (2015–2017), we
show that Republicans from districts with high levels of racial resentment are more likely to issue press releases that
attack President Barack Obama. In contrast, we find no evidence of racial resentment being positively associated with
another prominent Democratic white elected official, Hillary Clinton. Our results suggest that one reason Congress
may remain racially conservative even as representatives’ cycle out of office may be attributed to the electoral process.
Keywords
American politics, racial resentment, legislative behavior

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT