Research in Action: Biodiversity

Pages56-56
Page 56 THE ENVIRONMENTAL FORUM Copyright © 2011, Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, D.C. www.eli.org.
Reprinted by permission from The Environmental Forum®, March/April 2011
ELI Report
ELI, in collaboration
with the University of
North Carolina Institute
for the Environment and
the Wisconsin Wetlands
Association, is working to
facilitate greater collabora-
tion between hazard and
emergency managers and
wetland and water quality
managers in order to f‌ind
and promote ways to more
ef‌f‌iciently and ef‌fectively
protect wetland and wild-
life habitat and strengthen
resilience to f‌looding in the
Rock River Basin, a wa-
tershed in Wisconsin that
frequently f‌loods.
e project, funded by
the McKnight Founda-
tion, builds on a recent
study conducted by ELI
and UNC in Wisconsin.
e study identif‌ied op-
hazard areas as well as the
information needed and
funding sources available
for joint projects, such as
purchasing f‌lood-prone
properties to reduce risks
from natural hazards and
protect wetland habitat.
e guidebook will
include recommendations
for how hazard reduction
management can be coor-
dinated with water quality
and wetland protection
and will identify funding
sources that can be used
to meet multiple benef‌its.
e guidebook will be dis-
tributed to wetland con-
servation agencies, state
and local hazard planners,
and conservation organi-
zations across the region
and throughout the upper
Mississippi River Basin.
portunities and obstacles
for wildlife conservation
and habitat restoration in
areas where people and
property are at risk from
natural hazards. e study
found areas where priority
habitats, as identif‌ied in
State Wildlife
Action Plans,
overlap with
natural hazard
areas, and
highlighted
opportunities
to capitalize
on existing
synergies and
promote col-
laboration
among land
use planners,
hazard mitigation planners,
and wetland and wildlife
managers.
According to ELI Sci-
ence and Policy Analyst
Rebecca Kihslinger, We
plan to work with our part-
ners to develop a tailored
workshop followed by the
creation and dissemination
of a guidebook for local
and state
of‌f‌icials in
the region.
We will
design the
workshop to
explore how
agencies and
organizations
can work
ef‌fectively
together to
meet multiple
goals.
Options will include
identifying locations where
wetlands overlap natural
Research in Action: Wetlands
ELI Science and Policy Analyst
Rebecca Kihslinger, Ph.D.
Research in Action: Biodiversity
In October, ELI hosted
a side event at the 10th
meeting of the Confer-
ence of the Parties to the
Convention on Biologi-
cal Diversity in Nagoya,
Japan. e event focused
on the recently completed
resource manual Legal
and Policy Tools to Adapt
Biodiversity Manage-
ment to Climate Change.
e manual is part of a
project ELI is undertaking
with partners from around
the world to strengthen
laws governing biodiver-
sity management. e
project is made possible
through the generous sup-
port of the John D. and
Catherine T. MacArthur
Foundation.
Over the last few de-
dition, protected area
borders may need to be
redrawn and connectivity
between areas strength-
ened to account for
changing ecological con-
ditions. With increasing
competition for resources,
expanding development,
and the growing ef‌fects of
climate change, new legal
regimes and approaches
are crucial.
ELI is now working
with its partners from
Bhutan, Dominican Re-
public, Madagascar, Peru,
Uganda, and Vietnam to
take the resource manual
and apply its lessons in
developing countries to
f‌ind the best ways to adapt
biodiversity management
to climate change.
cades, countries have de-
veloped and implemented
governance frameworks
designed to protect biodi-
versity. Yet there remains
a critical gap in most of
the existing frameworks
governing biodiversity: by
and large, they fail to con-
sider, much less address,
the impacts of climate
change.
ELI Vice President
for Climate and Sustain-
ability Scott Schang, who
chaired the event, said,
“e inability of current
laws governing biodiver-
sity to ef‌fectively address
climate change will have
momentous consequences.
Laws can present barriers
to actions necessary for
long-term adaptation, for
example by prohibiting
relocation of endangered
species.” He explained
that underlying assump-
tions in a world undergo-
ing climate change may be
fundamentally dif‌ferent:
adaptation increasingly
focuses on conserving cen-
ters of evolution, not just
conserving biodiversity.
Current laws emphasize
preserving the status quo.
is means that instead of
improving the resilience
of a broader ecosystem
to climate change, these
laws often require scarce
resources to be focused
on protecting the most
endangered species. e
result could be that more
species will be threatened
in the long-run. In ad-

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT