Religiosity and Marital Stability Among Black American and White American Couples*

Date01 April 2008
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00493.x
AuthorEdna Brown,Jose A. Bauermeister,Terri L. Orbuch
Published date01 April 2008
Religiosity and Marital Stability Among Black American
and White American Couples*
Edna Brown Terri L. Orbuch Jose A. Bauermeister**
Abstract: We examine the effects of subjective and organizational religious participation on marital stability over
time for urban Black American couples and White American couples who participated in a longitudinal project.
Our findings indicated that the role religiosity plays in the stability of marriage over time varied by gender and race.
Black husbands and wives reported that religion was more important to them and that they attended religious serv-
ices more frequently than White husbands and wives. Greater service attendance was predictive of decreased odds of
divorce, only when reported by wives. Interaction effects revealed that the effect was more notable among White
wives. Practitioners should consider the diversity between and within couples and the sociohistorical contexts in
which marriages are embedded.
Key Words: gender, marital stability, race, religiosity.
Introduction
The literature on marriage is dominated by research
examining the factors that lead to marital instability
or divorce/separation. Although there is a lack of
consensus about the specific factors associated with
divorce, a number of researchers have focused on the
objective social and economic conditions that are
related to marital stability (Orbuch, House, Mero, &
Webster, 1996; White & Edwards, 1990). More
recently, there has been an interest in the role that
religiosity plays in the stability of marital relations
(Mahoney, Pargament, Tarakeshwar, & Swank,
2001). Religiosity is typically assessed via subjective
religious participation (religious beliefs) and organi-
zational religious participation (service attendance)
(Pargament, 1997); both aspects of religiosity may be
resources that contribute to marital stability among
couples—particularly for Black Americans (Sherkat
& Ellison, 1999). For example, Wilson and Musick
(1996) provided evidence that greater subjective and
organizational religious participation was associated
with enhanced family functioning and higher marital
satisfaction. Furthermore, Call and Heaton (1997)
found that when spouses participated in organiza-
tional religious activities together, couples were less
likely to divorce over time. Although most religious
doctrines and congregations promote attitudes for
the sanctity of marriage (Bumpass & Sweet, 1972;
Hodge, 1996), with the underlying assumption that
religious participation may encourage couples to
remain married and avoid divorce, we acknowledge
that divorce is not always bad or unwarranted.
In this study, we examined the links between reli-
giosity and marital stability over the first 7 years of
marriage for a representative sample of urban Black
American couples and White American couples who
participated in a longitudinal project. The proposed
research had two specific goals. First, we examined
whether there were gender and racial differences in
subjective and organizational religious participation
among Black American and White American cou-
ples. We also assessed the perceptions of each spouse
*The research in this paper was supported by a grant from the National Institute for Child and Human Development (HD40778) to the second author.
**Edna Brown is an assistant professor in the Department of Human Development and Family Studies at the University of Connecticut, 348 Mansfield Road, Unit
2058, Storrs, CT 06269 (edna.brown@uconn.edu). Terri L. Orbuch is a research professor in the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan and Pro-
fessor in the Department of Sociology at the Oakland University, ISR, 470 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (orbuch@umich.edu). Jose A. Bauermeister is
a postdoctoral fellow in the New York State Psychiatric Institute, HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit
15, New York, NY 10032 (jb2855@columbia.edu).
Family Relations, 57 (April 2008), 186–197. Blackwell Publishing.
Copyright 2008 by the National Council on Family Relations.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT