Relative Placement: The Best Answer for Our Foster Care System

Published date01 September 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12116
AuthorLeonard Edwards
Date01 September 2018
Relative Placement: The Best Answer for Our
Foster Care System
By Judge Leonard Edwards
ABSTRACT
This article briefly traces the history of the placement of children out of their
homes because of parental abuse or neglect. The preference for relative placement is a
recent occurrence. The advantages of relative placement instead of foster or group
care are summarized as well as the disadvantages. Relative placement rates across the
country are about 32%. Several jurisdictions have much higher placement rates
including Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Los Angeles, California, is experiment-
ing with social work practices that have produced over 80% relative placement rates
during the past year. How both of these jurisdictions accomplish high relative place-
ment rates is described in detail. Judges should persuade their own social service
agencies to adopt these practices.
Key words: Foster care, Relative Placement.
HISTORY
When the juvenile court removes a child from parental care because of abuse or
neglect, what type of placement best meets his or her needs? In the United States, the
answer to this question has evolved for more than a century.
Judge Leonard Edwards is a retired judge from the Santa Clara County, California, Superior Court
where he served for 26 years. Judge Edwards is now a mentor, teacher, and writer whose writings can be seen
on his website: judgeleonardedwards.com. He is a former president of the NCJFCJ and has made invited
presentations in 48 states and 13 foreign countries.
The author is thankful for the information gathered from the two Los Angeles pilot projects and the
cooperation from Regional Administrators Jennifer Lopez (Santa Fe Springs Office) and Aris S. Banico, M.A.
(Glendora Regional Office). The author acknowledges the advocacy efforts of Judge Michael Nash (ret.), now
the Director of the Office of Child Protection in Los Angeles for his long-standing support of relative place-
ment. The author is also grateful for the assistance provided by Corby Sturges from the Center for Families,
Children & the Courts, a division of the California Judicial Council, from Rob Waring, a Managing
Attorney representing children in Alameda County, and Sidney Hollar, Esq., a practicing attorney in San
Francisco.
Juvenile and Family Court Journal 69, No. 3
©2018 National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
55

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT