Regulation, deregulation, and antitrust in the telecommunications industry

Date01 March 1983
AuthorJohn R. Woodbury,Stanley M. Besen
Published date01 March 1983
DOI10.1177/0003603X8302800102
Subject MatterArticle
The Antitrust Bulletin/Spring
1983
39
Regulation, deregulation, and antitrust
in the telecommunications industry
BY STANLEY M. BESEN* and
JOHN
R. WOODBURY**
Introduction
Two decades ago, the U.S. domestic telecommunications market!
was a relatively simple place. A single vertically integrated firm,
the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), pro-
vided, without competition, virtually all long-distance telephone
service, produced the vast majority
of
all telephone equipment,
and marketed that equipment and local and long-distance service
through a series
of
more or less wholly owned franchised local
monopolies reaching almost the entire U.S. population. What
little competition AT&T faced came in the form
of
the Western
Union Company, which, along with
AT&T,
provided private line
service to large commercial and industrial customers.'
Senior Economist, The Rand Corporation .
•• Economist, Federal Trade Commission.
1This article does not treat the market for international telecom-
munications, nor is it concerned with developments that affect primarily
the television industry.
2This article does not address issues
of
federal-state jurisdiction.
Throughout, the terms that we use refer solely to those aspects
of
AUTHORS' NOTE: The views in this article are the authors' own and do
not reflect those
of
The Rand Corporation or the Federal
Trade
Commission. We are grateful to William Reece
for
his helpful com-
ments.
©1983by Federal LegalPublications, Inc.
40 The antitrust bulletin
In 1959, however, in a decision
that
turned
out
to be the first
of
a long series
of
developments
that
would profoundly affect the
structure
of
domestic telecommunications, the Federal Communi-
cations Commission (FCC) allocated aportion
of
the
radio
frequency spectrum to users desiring to construct their own
private microwave communications systems.' Now, more
than
two decades later, the shape
of
the industry is far different from
what it was then; the changes
that
occur in the next decade are
likely to be even more significant. The monopoly possessed by
AT&T in long-distance service is, even now, being slowly eroded
by firms offering both long-distance
and
private line services.
And
greater changes have occurred in the terminal equipment
market, where a veritable flood
of
suppliers compete with AT&T
in the provision
of
products ranging from sophisticated customer
switching equipment to ordinary telephone handsets. Moreover,
there are those who believe
that
even local exchange monopolies
are threatened by cable television systems, digital termination
systems, multipoint distribution services,
and
cellular radio sys-
tems. At the same time, arecent
FCC
decision will permit AT&T
to
provide many new services on an unregulated basis, so long as
it does so through separate subsidiaries.
And
last,
but
certainly
not
least, the settlement
of
agovernment antitrust suit will sever
the
local operating companies from
AT&T,
thus removing what
many have contended was the source
of
that
company's power in
the
interexchange
and
terminal equipment markets.
telecommunications
services
that are or
will
be provided within the
jurisdiction of federal regulatory authorities. "Long-distance services"
are ordinary telephone calls that require payments in addition to those
for local
service.
"Private line"
services
are communications channels
reserved
exclusively
for particular uses or users, such as connecting the
various geographically dispersed offices of a firm. "Interexchange
communications" are communication paths
between
two local exchange
areas and can refer either to private line or long-distance
services.
"Switched"
services
are those that permit the user of a channel to
communicate with one of any number of other users. Thus, ordinary
long-distance
service
is a
switched
service,
while
private line
services
mayor may not be.
3Allocation of
Microwave
Frequencies Above 890 Me (Above
890), 27
EC.C.
359 (1959), on reconsideration, 29
EC.C.
825 (1960).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT