Reforming Relocation Law: A Reply to Prof. Thompson

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12154
Date01 April 2015
Published date01 April 2015
ERRATUM
REFORMING RELOCATION LAW: A REPLY TO PROF.THOMPSON
In Parkinson and Cashmore, 2015, the following errors were published on page 56.
Key Points for the Family Court Community
Explores the differences between the use of presumptions and focused questions and highlights
the role of empirical research of the lived experience of children and families postrelocation
disputes
The text was incorrect and should have read:
Explores the differences between the use of presumptions and focused questions and highlights
the role of empirical research of the lived experience of children and families after relocation
disputes are over
We apologize for this error.
REFERENCE
Parkinson, P., Cashmore, J. (2015). Reforming relocation law: A reply to Prof. Thompson. Family Court Review, 53, 56–65.
FAMILY COURT REVIEW, Vol.53 No. 2, April 2015 353
© 2015 Association of Familyand Conciliation Cour ts

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT