Reforming Relocation Law: An Evidence‐Based Approach

• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12153
• Date: 01 April 2015
• Published date: 01 April 2015

ERRATA

REFORMING RELOCATION LAW: AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH

In Parkinson and Cashmore, 2015, the following errors were published in the article.

Key Points for the Family Court Community, page 23

• Describes the findings of empirical research on relocation disputes in Australia on the lived

experience of children and families postrelocation disputes.

The text was incorrect and should have read:

• Describes the findings of empirical research on relocation disputes in Australia and on the lived

experience of children after relocation disputes are over.

Page 25, 2nd paragraph

This article results from reflections on our contributions to that body of empirical knowledge. . . in

Australia using mixed models.

The text was incorrect and should have read:

This article results from reflections on our contributions to that body of empirical knowledge. . . in

Australia using mixed methods.

(g) The Reasons for Relocation Matter, page 33

Appellate courts in some jurisdictions state that there ought to be no need for a residential

parent to show compelling reasons for moving (AMS v. AIF 1999 CLR 160, High Court of Australia)

or that . . .

The text was incorrect and should have read:

Appellate courts in some jurisdictions state that there ought to be no need for a residential parent

to show compelling reasons for moving (AMS v. AIF (1999) 199 CLR 160, High Court of Australia)

or that . . .

We apologize for these errors.

REFERENCE

Parkinson, P, Cashmore, J. (2015). Reforming relocation law:An evidence-based approach. Family Court Review, 53, 23–39.

FAMILY COURT REVIEW, Vol.53 No. 2, April 2015 352

© 2015 Association of Familyand Conciliation Cour ts