Reflections of Cross‐Cultural Collaboration Science
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/job.1881 |
Published date | 01 August 2013 |
Date | 01 August 2013 |
Author | Eduardo Salas,Maritza Salazar |
Reflections of Cross-Cultural Collaboration Science
MARITZA SALAZAR
1
AND EDUARDO SALAS
2
*
1
Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, U.S.A.
2
Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.
The notion that effective collaboration benefits team and organizational performance has been around for many
years. Interest in the construct of collaboration is a dominant area of research not only in the fields of industrial
organizational psychology and organizational behavior but also in other areas of study such as sociology and
medicine (Bedwell et al., 2012). Most recently, the prevalence and growth of global work, consisting of activities
such as trade, off-shoring, and economic activity across national borders, has aroused the interest of cross-cultural
psychologists in studying collaboration. The articles presented in this special issue provide evidence of this growing
area of inquiry.
Looking across this growing body of theoretical and empirical research, we observe that the use of a common
definition of this construct could help future cross-cultural and multicultural research to be more fruitfully
conducted. Hence, our goal here is to highlight several fundamental questions that exist regarding collaboration
within and across national and cultural borders. We will not attempt to review or summarize the literature that
has been amassed over the past few decades. Rather, we seek to provide an integrated view of the key questions,
problems, and opportunities that pose a direct challenge to our field. By highlighting these areas, we seek to
stimulate others to conduct needed research.
We believe that several fundamental questions regarding the nature of collaboration within and across cultures
still exist. These questions are as follows: (i) What can be gained by studying collaboration from a cross-cultural
perspective? (ii) What do we know (and not know) about collaboration within and between cultures? (iii) What
do we need to know in order to effectively manage multicultural collaborations? (iv) How should we advance
scholarship about cross-cultural and multicultural collaborations? The remainder of this paper is organized around
these focal questions. Prior to answering these questions, we start with the presentation of a unifying definition of
collaboration and the value for studying collaboration from a cultural perspective in the first place. We conclude
with recommendations for future directions.
What is This Thing Called “Collaboration”?
Providing the field with a common definition of collaboration is a critical starting point for advancing theory and
research. Defining collaboration is not an easy task given that over 20 different definitions of it across 10 different
disciplines have been identified in the literature (Bedwell et al., 2012). Scholars have also conceptualized
collaboration across levels of analysis defining it at interpersonal, team, organizational, and interorganizational
levels. Further complicating matters, the literature has also been murky on the relationship between collaboration,
teamwork, coordination, and cooperation.
The inconsistent use of the term collaboration creates confusion and inhibits the theoretical and empirical
exploitation of this construct. The definition established by Bedwell et al. (2012) stating, “collaboration is as an
evolving process whereby two or more social entities actively and reciprocally engage in joint activities aimed at
*Correspondence to: Eduardo Salas, Department of Psychology,University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A. E-mail: esalas@ist.ucf.edu
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, J. Organiz. Behav. 34, 910–917 (2013)
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/job.1881
Special Issue Article
To continue reading
Request your trial