Reducing information asymmetry and increasing health value co‐creation in a rural healthcare context

Published date01 June 2022
AuthorAndrew J. Dahl,James W. Peltier,George R. Milne
Date01 June 2022
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12447
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Reducing information asymmetry and
increasing health value co-creation in a rural
healthcare context
Andrew J. Dahl
1
| James W. Peltier
1
| George R. Milne
2
1
College of Business and Economics,
Marketing, University of Wisconsin-
Whitewater, Whitewater,
Wisconsin, USA
2
Isenberg School of Management,
University of Massachusetts Amherst,
Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
Correspondence
George R. Milne, George R. Milne,
University of Massachusetts Amherst,
Isenberg School of Management,
121 Presidents Drive, Amherst,
MA 01003, USA.
Email: milne@isenberg.umass.edu
Abstract
Digital platforms offer emerging opportunities for dis-
seminating information to improve decision-making,
motivate behavior changes, and enhance outcomes.
However, consumer-physician asymmetry and tradi-
tional service delivery principles create resource
utilization conflicts that may hinder health value co-
creation efforts. We address how expert service con-
textswithhighlevelsofinformationasymmetrymay
maximize value co-creation by encouraging con-
sumers' digital information usage to close the
consumer-physician information gap. Structural equa-
tion modeling of rural consumer surveys demonstrates
the ancillary value created by supporting consumers'
digital resource integration. The results identify how
physicians may increase rural consumers' co-creation
of health outcomes by helping consumers utilize digi-
tal information to facilitate their activation in value
co-creation. However, physicians and consumers first
need to share value perceptions of the digital inputs to
maximize consumers' resource integration and co-
creation efforts.
KEYWORDS
digital health, information asymmetry, information seeking,
resource integration, service-dominant logic, value co-creation
Received: 3 June 2021 Revised: 5 February 2022 Accepted: 12 February 2022
DOI: 10.1111/joca.12447
© 2022 American Council on Consumer Interests.
512 J Consum Aff. 2022;56:512–535.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/joca
1|INTRODUCTION
Expert services often result in consumers having less knowledge than the service provider,
resulting in conditions of information asymmetry (Barile et al., 2014). Broadly, information
asymmetry exists in a service relationship when an information imbalance exists whereby one
party has more or better information than another (Akerlof, 1970). An extensive review by
Bergh et al. (2019) shows that reducing the information imbalance between service providers
and consumers is a key mechanism for reducing information asymmetry. Within the context of
healthcare, information imbalances are often due to the fact that physicians are the primary or
even the sole source of needed health and wellness insights (Dahl et al., 2018). Consumer-
physician information imbalance leads to misinformation and consumer (patient) failure to
adhere to evidence-based guidelines, contributing to issues that make preventative healthcare
more difficult to co-create (Gallan et al., 2019). Because of this information imbalance, con-
sumers commonly feel challenged when understanding their health, increasing their reliance
on physicians for comprehending prescribed pro-health behaviors (Singh et al., 2004).
Consumers who actively seek information outside of the consumer-physician relationship
are often overwhelmed with the amount and conflicting nature of health-related information
(Anderson et al., 2016; Kareklas et al., 2015). It is thus not surprising that for many consumers,
this resource integration process is complex and may minimize value co-creation efforts (Chen
et al., 2021; Virlée et al., 2020). One of our research aims is to examine mechanisms through
which consumers may narrow the consumer-physician information imbalance (Edvardsson
et al., 2011), and specifically through digital health information usage. Information asymmetry
reduction has been found to occur with increased use of digital communications (Gutiérrez-
Barroso et al., 2021; Manes & Tchetchik, 2018; Peltier et al., 2020). By facilitating consumers'
resource integration, physicians may help co-create positive outcomes on consumer well-being
via motivating consumers to engage in value co-creation efforts such as information seeking,
sharing, and cooperative behaviors (McColl-Kennedy et al., 2017).
Marketing scholars are beginning to investigate consumers' digital resource and information
usage behaviors and the resulting impact on value co-creation efforts (Peltier et al., 2020). Con-
sumers' health information seeking increasingly occurs via digital platforms beyond the service
provider's control (Dahl et al., 2021). For example, more than 141 million visits to WebMD.com
occur monthly (SimilarWeb, 2021), and Google receives over 70,000 health-related searches per
minute (Murphy, 2019). Despite its promise for improving health outcomes, consumers' digital
health information usage is not without controversy (Nunan & Di Domenico, 2019; Robertson
et al., 2014). While many healthcare providers feel confident about internally created informa-
tion, they often question the credibility of resources created and shared externally, leading to
integration conflicts and consumer-physician information asymmetry (Anderson et al., 2016).
Consequently, a major aim of the current study is to examine the mechanisms that consumers
utilize to judge the credibility and value of externally created digital health information
resources, and particularly those with perceived physician support.
The service-dominant (S-D) logic perspective offers insights for addressing asymmetry and
value co-creation within expert service contexts. S-D logic argues that consumers play a central
role in co-creating and defining service value (Vargo & Lusch, 2016). Consumers' resource inte-
gration efforts are more likely to maximize value co-creation when both the consumer and ser-
vice provider have a greater understanding of the decision-making context (Davey &
Grönroos, 2019). Consistent with the S-D logic perspective, value co-creation in a health ser-
vices context is contingent on four elements: (1) physician–consumer collaboration (Storbacka
DAHL ET AL.513

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex