Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission 395 U.S. 367 (1969)

Author:Martin Shapiro
Pages:2144
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 2144

The Federal Communications Commission promulgated fairness rules requiring balanced BROADCASTING on public issues. The Court answered FIRST AMENDMENT challenges by arguing that different media required different constitutional standards, and that the scarcity of frequencies both necessitated government allocation and justified requirements that allocatees insure balanced programming. Comparing Red Lion to MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO. V. TORNILLO (1974) indicates that electronic media enjoy less editorial freedom than do the print media. As technological developments undercut the scarcity rationale, the Court shifted toward an intrusiveness-into-the-home rationale for greater regulation of...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP