Reconceptualising Hierarchies: The Disaggregation and Dispersion of Headquarters in Multinational Corporations

AuthorTomi Laamanen,Philip Kappen,Phillip C. Nell
Date01 December 2017
Published date01 December 2017
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12313
Reconceptualising Hierarchies: The Disaggregation
and Dispersion of Headquarters in Multinational
Corporations
Phillip C. Nell
a,b
, Philip Kappen
c
and Tomi Laamanen
d
a
WU Wien (Vienna University of Economics and Business);
b
Copenhagen Business School;
c
Uppsala
University;
d
University of St. Gallen
ABSTRACT In this paper, we provide an introduction to the Special Issue entitled ‘Divide and
Rule? The Emergence and Implications of Increasingly Disaggregated and Dispersed
Headquarters Activities in Contemporary Firms’. The purpose is two-fold. First, we propose a
conceptualization of headquarters activities as a dynamic system in which activities can be
distributed organizationally and spatially. We explicitly break with the dominant view of the
prior research on ‘the headquarters’ as a single, identifiable unit in one specific location.
Second, building on the manuscripts accepted for publication in this Special Issue, we outline
research implications and put forward an agenda for research on the emergence and
continuous management of disaggregated and dispersed headquarters systems.
Keywords: agency theory, complexity, headquarters, information processing theory,
institutional theory, internationalization, multinational corporation, parenting, resource-based
view
INTRODUCTION
We launched this Special Issue in the Journal of Management Studies in recognition of the
need to revisit what we know about the role and organization of headquarters in multi-
national corporations (MNCs). This recognition stemmed from the fact that most of the
existing empirical and theoretical work has tended to employ a rather simplistic concept
of headquarters and its activities (Hoenen and Kostova, 2014; Zhou, 2014). Frequently,
corporate headquarters has been viewed as a single, identifiable unit at the apex of the
organization, which is located in one place and has dyadic relationships with its subsidia-
ries (e.g., Bouquet and Birkinshaw, 2008; Ciabuschi et al., 2011; Monteiro et al., 2008;
O’Donnell, 2000; Roth and O’Donnell, 1996). While using such a reductionist view of
Address for reprints: Phillip C. Nell, Institute for International Business, WU Wien (Vienna University of
Economics and Business), Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Wien, Austria (pnell@wu.ac.at).
V
C2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies
Journal of Management Studies 54:8 December 2017
doi: 10.1111/joms.12313
headquarters has been useful in generating valuable insights on headquarters–subsidiary
relationships and on the role and functioning of headquarters, this view seems to
increasingly clash with empirical observations. Recent research has shown that head-
quarters activities are often geographically dispersed and configured in increasingly
complex ways (Baaij and Slangen, 2013; Birkinshaw et al., 2006, 2017; Decreton et al.,
2017; Goold and Campbell, 2002; Zhou, 2014). For example, Desai (2009, p. 1284)
notes that we are now witnessing firms that are ‘Bermuda-incorporated, Paris-headquartered
(...), listed on the NYSE [New York Stock Exchange] with US-style investor protections and disclosure
rules, a chief information officer in Bangalore, a chief finance officer in Brussels and a chief operating
officer in Beijing’.
Hence, what seems to emerge is a reality in which not only regular value chain
activities but also headquarters activities (Baaij and Slangen, 2013) are increasingly
disaggregated’ (also referred to as ‘fine-sliced’) and ‘dispersed’ along organizational and geo-
graphical boundaries (Contractor et al., 2010). For example, Desai (2009), Baaij and
Slangen (2013), and Birkinshaw et al. (2006) provide interesting insights into how firms,
such as General Electric (GE), HSBC, IBM, Lenovo, Nokia, and Royal Dutch Shell,
have disaggregated and dispersed their financial, legal, and managerial headquarters
activities across different locations. Current research, however, falls short of accounting
for the implications of this new phenomenon, and numerous scholars have called for
more research on multi-layered hierarchical structures and the roles of multiple
(intermediary) headquarters and their (re)location patterns (Benito et al., 2011; Hoenen
and Kostova, 2014; Laamanen et al., 2012; Menz et al., 2015; Meyer and Benito, 2016;
Zhou, 2014).
Overall, we believe that there is a need for a deeper understanding of the emergence,
evolution, management, and consequences of organizationally disaggregated, geograph-
ically dispersed headquarters to further develop our current theorizing of organizations
and (international) management. To meet this need, we call for further research on dif-
ferent types of headquarters configurations to challenge the assumptions and boundary
conditions of existing theories in order to modify and extend them (Roth and Kostova,
2003). Moreover, although we frame our paper around MNCs, many of the themes dis-
cussed in this Special Issue on headquarters activities should also be applicable to
domestically operating large multi-business firms.
This Special Issue Introduction has two primary objectives. First, we build on the
abovementioned observations to deepen the understanding of headquarters in multi-
business firms and to contribute to theoretical and empirical developments in this area.
We put forward a conceptualization of the MNC headquarters as a dynamic system of
parenting activities. Extending the work by Contractor et al. (2010) published in 2010 in
the Special Issue on ‘Offshoring and Outsourcing’ in the Journal of Management Studies,we
suggest that, similar to regular value chain activities, headquarters activities can be
analysed by their degree of organizational disaggregation and geographic dispersion.
Second, we discuss some of the most interesting emerging themes in the context of
disaggregated and dispersed headquarters and identify potential theoretical lenses
through which they can potentially be studied. We showcase the contributions contained
in the Special Issue and elaborate on their contributions, highlighting the way they
move the field forward.
1122 P. C. Nell et al.
V
C2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT