Recent journal literature

Date01 January 2022
52 ELR 10072 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REPORTER 1-2022
“Recent Journal Literature” lists recently published law
review and other legal periodical articles. Within subject-
matter categories, entries are listed alphabetically by author
or title. Articles are listed rst, followed by comments, notes,
symposia, surveys, and bibliographies.
RECENT JOURNAL LITERATURE
AIR
Ray, Cris, Cleaning Up Venue: Chevron Deference and the
Venue Provision of the Clean Air Act, 22 N.Y.U. J. L.
 P. P’ 751 (2020).
CLIMATE CHANGE
Burman, omas, A New Causal Pathway for Recovery in
Climate Change Litigation?, 52 ELR 10038 (Jan.
2022).
Rose, Emma, A Sinking World: A Model Framework for Cli-
mate Change Adaptation Measures in Coastal Cities,
53 V. J. T’ L. 367 (2020).
Viswanathan, Prateck, e United States’ Climate Patenting
Behavior After the Paris Agreement Withdrawal Announce-
ment: An Empirical Analysis and a Fast-Track Proposal,
2021 U. I. L. R. 261 (2021).
ENERGY
Christiansen, Matthew R. & Joshua C. Macey, Long Live the
Federal Power Act’s Bright Line, 134 H. L. R. 1360
(2021).
Dow, Jacob, To Drill or Not to Drill: Does a Lessee Truly Have
to Drill a Well to Satisfy the Habendum Clause of an Oil
and Gas Lease?, 52 T. T. L. R. 315 (2020).
Fredericks, Carla F. et al., Social Cost and Material Loss: e
Dakota Access Pipeline, 22 N.Y.U. J. L.  P. P’
563 (2020).
Gradwohl, Jeremy, Electric Utility-Caused Wildre Damages:
Strict Liability Under Article I, Section 19 of the Califor-
nia Constitution, 92 T. L. R. 595 (2020).
Horne, Zachary, e “Dead Hand” in Oil and Gas Transac-
tions: How the Rule Against Perpetuities Is Rearing Its Ugly
Head in Texas Oil and Gas Law, 60 S. T. L. R. 697
(2020).
Huston, Jacob, e Energy Consumption of Bitcoin Mining
and Potential for Regulation, 11 G. W. J. E
 E’ L. 32 (2020).
Kalen, Sam, A Bridge to Nowhere? Our Energy Transition
and the Natural Gas Pipeline Wars, 9 M. J. E’ 
A. L. 319 (2020).
Litteral, Sean L., After the Wildres: PG&E, Bankruptcy, and
Corporate Sustainability, 43 E: E’ L.  P’
1 (2020).
Portereld, Matthew C., Border Adjustments for Carbon Tax-
es, PPMs, and the WTO, 41 U. P. J. I’ L. 1 (2019).
Richards, Raymond, Adjusting Renewable Portfolio Standards
to Incentivize Energy Storage in New Hampshire, 11 G.
W. J. E  E’ L. 42 (2020).
Szmolyan, Aundene, Disunity Among the United States: Navi-
gating Net-Metering Without Getting Electrocuted, 13 J.
B. E  L. 129 (2019).
GOVERNMENT
Barclay, Stephanie Hall & Michalyn Steele, Rethinking
Protections for Indigenous Sacred Sites, 134 H. L. R.
1294 (2021).
Bolton, Jacob Z., Health in All or Prot for Some: Health and
Racial Equity in All Policy for a Just Transition, 20 J.L.
S’ 315 (2020).
Chertok, Mark A. et al., Environmental Law: Developments
in the Law of SEQRA, 69 S L. R. 773 (2019).
Coglianese, Cary, Illuminating Regulatory Guidance, 9 M.
J. E’  A. L. 247 (2020).
Erpenbach, Jackson, e Federal Coal Leasing Program as an
Actionable Subsidy Under International Trade Law,
9 M. J. E’  A. L. 503 (2020).
Hu, Sacred B., Overcoming Environmental Racism: A Lesson
From the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 11 G. W. J.
E  E’ L. 22 (2020).
Klafehn, Ruslan, Burning Down the House: Do Brazil’s Forest
Management Policies Violate the No-Harm Rule Under
the CBD and Customary International Law?, 35 A. U.
I’ L. R. 941 (2020).
Kury, Franklin L. et al., e Constitutional Right to Save the
Environment, 52 ELR 10007 (Jan. 2022).
Metz, Matthew N. & Janelle London, State Vehicle Electri-
cation Mandates and Federal Preemption, 9 M. J.
E’  A. L. 433 (2020).
Nichols, Audrey, Bidding Adieu to the National Ocean Policy:
Exploring Oshore Drilling Policies and the Need for Inte-
grated Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning in the Trump
Era, 11 G. W. J. E  E’ L. 1 (2020).
LAND USE
Beaton, Laura D. & Matthew D. Zinn, Knick v. Township
of Scott: A Source of New Uncertainty for State and Local
Governments in Regulatory Takings Challenges to Land Use
Regulation, 47 F U. L.J. 623 (2020).
Butler, Lynda L., Murr v. Wisconsin and the Inherent Limits
of Regulatory Takings, 47 F. S. U. L. R. 99 (2019).
Dana, David A., Not Just a Procedural Case: e Substantive
Implications of Knick for State Property Law and Federal
Takings Doctrine, 47 F U. L.J. 591 (2020).
Gilliland, Nicole, Land Use Controls to Mitigate Environ-
mental and Public Health Harms Caused by Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operations, 29 S. C. I. L.J.
323 (2020).
Gruenisen, Timothy, Implementing Regulatory Policies to
Unlock the Potential of Gene Editing in Agriculture:
Building on the Successes of the United States Coordinated
Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology, 25 D
J. A. L. 61 (2020).
Copyright © 2022 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT