Recent journal literature

Date01 November 2019
11-2019 NEWS & ANALYSIS 49 ELR 11083
“Recent Journal Literature” lists recently published law
review and other legal periodical articles. Within subject-
matter categories, entries are listed alphabetically by
author or title. Articles are listed rst, followed by
comments, notes, symposia, surveys, and bibliographies.
RECENT JOURNAL LITERATURE
CLIMATE CHANGE
Babcock, Hope, Here Today, Gone Tomorrow—Is Global Cli-
mate Change Another White Man’s Trick to Get Indian
Land? e Role of Treaties in Protecting Tribes as ey
Adapt to Climate Change, 2017 M. S. L. R. 371
(20 17).
Banda, Maria L ., e Bottom-Up Alternative: e Migration
Potential of Private Climate Governance After the Paris
Agreement, 42 H. E . L. R. 325 (2018).
Bryne, Calvin, Climate Change and Human Migration, 8 UC
I L . R. 761 (2018).
Bullock, David A.C., Combating Climate Recalcitrance:
Carbon-Related Border Tax Adjustments in a New Era
of Global Climate Governance, 27 W. I’ L.J. 609
(2018 ).
Dotson, Greg, State Authority to Regulate Mobile Source
Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Part 1: History and Current
Challenge, 49 ELR 11037 (Nov. 2019).
Qureshi, Waseem Ahmad, Combating Climate Change in
the Indus River Basin, 10 K. J. E, A .  N.
R L. 1 (2017-2018).
Sympos ium, Sustainability Conference of American Legal Edu-
cators, 50 A. S. L.J. 431 (2018).
ENERGY
Franks, Cal i M., Too Littl e Too La te: e Infeasibility of OSHA’s
Silica Standards in the Oil Industry, 49 S. M’ L.J.
819 ( 2018).
Hudson, Blake, Harnessing Energ y Markets to Conserve Natu-
ral Resources? e Case of Southern U.S. Forests, 4 4 F.
S. U. L. R. 995 (2017).
Mertz, Nicolas, Economic Incentives: Or How I Learned to
Stop Worrying and Accept Nuclear Power, 98 B.U. L. R .
1067 (2018).
Mura, Jennifer, Oil Pollution Violations and Enforcement:
Who Is Responsible for Maintaining the Oil Record Book?,
17 L. M . L.J. 381 (2018).
Ricci, Lily, Two Ideas, Many Outcomes: How Anti-Waste Senti-
ments and the Public Trust Doctrine Support Varied Inter-
ests in Fracking-Related Litigation, 30 G. E. L.
R. 499 (2018).
Rogers, Siarra, e Inuence of Property in the Law of Energy
Development: How the United States as a Landowner Can
Limit Environmental Degradation on Federal Lands, 36
V. E. L.J. 386 (2018).
Sympos ium, Balancing Act—Energy Innovation in a Complex
Market, 42 C .-U.S. L .J. 117 (2018).
GOVERNANCE
Belding, Sean P., China’s Island Building in the South China
Sea: Collateral E ect on the UNCLOS and Potential Solu-
tions, 40 H. J. I’ L. 10 03 (2018 ).
Bishop, Robyn, Investing in the Future: Why the SEC Should
Require a Uniform Climate Change Disclosure Framework
to Protect Investors and Mitigate U.S . Financial Instability,
48 E . L. 491 (2 018).
Chen, James Ming, e Fragile Menagerie: Biodiversity, Loss,
Climate Change, and the Law, 93 I. L.J. 3 03 (2018 ).
Czarnezk i, Jason J. et al., Crafting Next Generation Eco-Label
Policy, 48 E . L. 409 (2018).
Dellinger, Myanna, Electric Utility Wildre Liability Reform
in California, 49 ELR 11003 (Nov. 2019).
Glass Geltman, Eli zabeth An n, Environmental Health Regu-
lation in the Trump Era: How President Trump’s Two-for-
One Regulatory Plan Impacts Environmental Regulation,
51 U. M. J.L. R  669 ( 2018).
Glicksman, Robert L . & David L. Markel l, Unraveling the
Administrative State: Mechanism Choice, Key Actors, and
Regulatory Tools, 36 V. E. L.J. 318 (2018).
Kohl, Adam W., China’s Articial Island Building Campaign
in the South China Sea: Implications for the Reform of the
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 122
D L. R . 917 (2018).
Lee, Joshua, Ecofeminism as Responsible Governance: Analyz-
ing the Mercury Regulations as a Case Study, 42 H  .
E . L. R. 519 (2018).
Lininger, Tom, Green Ethics for Judges, 86 G. W. L.
R. 711 (2018).
Loder, Reed Elizabeth, Asteroid Mining: Ecological Jurispru -
dence Beyond Earth, 36 V. E . L.J. 275 (2018).
Roth, Lauren R., Managing Cumulative Risk, 44 M 
H  L. R . 1283 (2 018).
Trimble, Travis M., Environmental Law, 69 M L. R.
1133 (2018 ).
Sympos ium, From Exxon to Paris: A Review of Environmental
Law Over the Last 30 Years, 30 G . E . L. R. 401
(2018 ).
LAND USE
Farber, Daniel A., Murr v. Wisconsin and the Future of Tak-
ings Law, 2017 S. C. R. 115 ( 2017 ).
Copyright © 2019 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex