Real interest parity: Evidence from trade partnerships

Date01 July 2018
AuthorMustapha Ibn Boamah
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2017.10.002
Published date01 July 2018
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Real interest parity: Evidence from trade partnerships
Mustapha Ibn Boamah
Faculty of Business, University of New
Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada
Correspondence
Mustapha Ibn Boamah, Faculty of
Business, University of New Brunswick,
New Brunswick, Canada.
Email: mboamah@unb.ca
Abstract
This study investigates real interest parity (RIP) in trade partnerships, and whether
RIP depends on the type of trade partnership, using short term interest rates and
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) obtained from the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) database between 1975 and 2016. The
investigation employs unit root and stationarity tests on interest rate differentials
to study RIP between countries using Germany, United States, and Japan as base
countries for selected countries in the European Union (EU), member countries of
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and selected Asian coun-
tries respectively. The results show evidence in favor of RIP in the selected EU
countries. The interest rate differentials of Belgium, France, Italy, Spain and the
UK with respect to Germany confirms a long-run relationship and real interest
rate parity. There is also evidence to support the RIP in the other trade partner-
ships. With the exception of Mexico, the interest rate differentials for all the
countries are stationary, and each quickly reverts to its mean.
JEL CLASSIFICATION
C22, F15, F36
KEYWORDS
Real interest parity, Real interest rate differential, Stationarity tests, Trade blocs
1
|
INTRODUCTION
The growth in international trade and financial liberalization has brought countries closer and increased international finan-
cial integration. Real interest parity condition equates expected real interest rate differences to expected changes in real
exchange rates. If purchasing power parity is expected to hold, meaning economic agents make their forecasts using
rational expectations and arbitrage forces in a trade bloc are free to act in the goods and assets markets, and no real
exchange rate change is anticipated, then real interest rates in all countries are expected to be ident ical.
A confirmation or rejection of the real interest rate parity is a test of the degree of market integration between countries.
The real interest rate parity (RIP) as a measure of international integration in the goods and assets market is based on
apparent frictionless markets. With increasing volume of international trade and liberalization of domestic financial systems
in Europe, North America and Asia, goods and capital markets are expected to rapidly integrate among trading partners.
Integration of markets tends to limit the ability of central banks to use real interest rates to regulate domestic economic
activity.
This paper approaches the issue by employing unit root and stationarity tests on interest rate differentials to investigate
RIP among countries in two free trade blocs, the EU, NAFTA and two trade partnerships in Asia. It is expected that the
First published online by Elsevier on behalf of The University of New Orleans, 6 October, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2017.10.002
Received: 24 April 2017
|
Revised: 5 September 2017
|
Accepted: 4 October 2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2017.10.002
Rev Financ Econ. 2018;36:199205. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rfe ©2017 The University of New Orleans
|
199

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT