Taking aim at raves: promoters say the all-night parties are for dancing. Opponents say they're havens for illegal drugs like ecstasy.

• Author: Vilbig, Peter
• Position: Brief Article

The rave on New Year's Eve in San Francisco attracted 10,400 dancers, and was so organized that there were ATMs on hand. It was a huge manic megaparty, and everything went fine until two people collapsed. Peter Hoang, 19, and Michael James Uveges, 23, were later pronounced dead of suspected overdoses of the club drug ecstasy.

Opponents seized on the deaths as further proof that raves are little more than excuses for drug abuse. They say ecstasy overdoses account for several fatalities every year and resulted in more than 5,500 emergency-room visits in 2001 alone.

Ravers say their parties are for dancing. Considering the thousands of rave participants, they argue, overdoses are rare. and are dwarfed by deaths attributed to alcohol--including 1,441 people aged 15 to 20 who died driving drunk in 2001.

Now the U.S. Congress may enter the debate.

SHUTTING DOWN RAVES

Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) filed a bill in the last Congress called the RAVE Act (it stands for Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy), which would hold property owners and promoters liable for drug use on their premises. A property owner or club owner could face 20 years in prison if found guilty.

Biden says he hopes the bill will put many raves out of business. "Unfortunately most raves are havens for illicit drag use," he says. "Enacting the bill will help prosecute the promoters who seek to profit from exploiting and endangering young lives."

Critics of the bill say it's an attack on dance culture, written so broadly that club owners and concert...