RAMBO: The evaluation of an intervention program for UK mentally abnormal young offenders

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-1152(05)12003-1
Date08 August 2005
Pages53-73
Published date08 August 2005
AuthorTheodore I. Mutale
RAMBO: THE EVALUATION OF AN
INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOR
UK MENTALLY ABNORMAL
YOUNG OFFENDERS
Theodore I. Mutale
ABSTRACT
This chapter offers a prospective and naturalistic study of the impact of a
risk-assessment and risk-management program on mentally abnormal
young offenders admitted to a medium secure adolescent psychiatric in-
patient unit in the United Kingdom (U.K.) because of violent, dangerous
or self-harming behaviour. As a result of the risk assessment, there was a
reduction in their violent, dangerous or self-harming behaviour that was
significantly associated with a reduction in the number of risk factors.
About 80% were discharged directly back into the community.
Public concerns over the dangerous behaviour of some people with mental
disorder and the introduction of the Care Program Approach in the U.K.
has put risk assessment at the centre of public safety debates (HMSO, 1989;
Duggan, 1997). Risk assessment instruments and procedures that have been
developed in response to these public concerns are applicable mainly to
The Organizational Response to Persons with Mental Illness Involved with the Criminal Justice
System
Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, Volume 12, 53–73
Copyright r2005 by Elsevier Ltd.
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved
ISSN: 0196-1152/doi:10.1016/S0196-1152(05)12003-1
53
adults. A further important development is that some investigators now
regard risk management as an integral part of a comprehensive risk assess-
ment (Heilbrun, 1997) because some do not regard a one-time risk predic-
tion as adequate (Steadman et al., 1993). With very few exceptions (Hoge &
Andrews, 1996) risk assessment linked to risk management in adolescents
has received less attention.
The aim of this study is to determine the impact of a structured risk
management program targeted at risk factors identified by an adolescent
risk-assessment checklist in a medium secure unit for mentally disordered
young offenders. The study was conducted in a U.K. national medium
secure or locked adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit that received patient
referrals from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
The risk-assessment checklist, RAMBO (Risk Assessment Multi-system
Behavioural Outcomes), is a questionnaire comprising of 63 risk and pro-
tective factors (18 static and 45 dynamic) for adolescent antisocial, offend-
ing, dangerous and self-harming behaviour derived from the literature
(Burgess, Hartman, & McCormack, 1987;Cornell, Peterson, & Richards,
1999;Hoge, Andrews, & Leschied, 1996;Mossman, 1994;Lynam, 1996;
Lewandowski & Westman, 1996;Rodham, Hawton, & Evans, 2004). The 63
items reflect risk and protective factors in the three subsystems to which
most young people belong to – family, school and peer group. In order to
ensure that there was a systematic inquiry of risk and protective factors,
operational definitions for most items were included in a manual that ac-
companies the checklist. Risk factors reflected childhood adversity, sub-
stance misuse, current and past antisocial or offending behaviour, current
and past self harm, individual characteristics such as empathy and impulse
control and psychopathology.
The definition and rating of optimal parenting is similar to that adopted
by the Parenting Bonding Instrument (Parker, Tupling, & Brown, 1979).
The definition of emotional abuse used in the checklist has previously been
described in the literature (Glaser, 1995). The definitions and rating of
anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, passivity and paranoid ideation
were similar to corresponding items in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
(Ventura, Lukoff, & Nuechterlein, 1993). The definition and rating of the
symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder was similar to the items in
the post-traumatic stress disorder scale of the Trauma Symptom Checklist
for Children (Briere, 1996). In all, the checklist was simply a structured and
systematic extension of history taking and determined the number of risk
factors present and was not meant to be a risk prediction schedule (see the
appendix).
54

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT