Racial and Ethnic Similarities and Differences in Beliefs About Intergenerational Assistance to Older Adults After Divorce and Remarriage*

Date01 December 2006
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00427.x
AuthorTanja C. Rothrauff,Lawrence H. Ganong,Marilyn Coleman
Published date01 December 2006
Racial and Ethnic Similarities and Differences in
Beliefs About Intergenerational Assistance to
Older Adults After Divorce and Remarriage*
Marilyn Coleman Lawrence H. Ganong Tanja C. Rothrauff**
Abstract: We examined beliefs about intergenerational responsibilities to assist older kin with a national sample of
362 Latinos, 492 African Americans, 121 Asian Americans, and 2,122 White European Americans using multiple-
segment factorial vignettes. More similarities than differences existed between ethnic groups, but Asian Americans
and African Americans endorsed norms that younger adults should assist older kin more often than White European
Americans. Latinos did not differ from European Americans in beliefs about intergenerational assistance. All groups
believed that parents should be helped more than stepparents.
Key Words: African Americans, Asian Americans, family gerontology, intergenerational family obligations, Latinos.
Studies of normative beliefs about intergenerational
assistance rely primarily on samples comprised of
White Americans of European descent (Ganong &
Coleman, 1999); African Americans, Asian Ameri-
cans, Latinos, and other racial and ethnic groups
tend to be underrepresented or not included at all.
This is a significant limitation, particularly in light
of demographic changes in the United States.
Although White European Americans comprise
about 72% of the U.S. population, this proportion
is expected to decrease to 53% in the next 50 years
(Spencer & Hollmann, 1998). The number of Afri-
can Americans will double in that same time period,
whereas the number of people of Latino and Asian
descent will double in 20 years. Asian Americans,
now 4.2% of the U.S. population, will be 10% by
2060 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000).
Results from the few studies that have examined
race, ethnicity, and intergenerational responsibilities
suggest that Latinos and Asian Americans endorse
norms of intergenerational assistance more often
than White European Americans (Burr & Mutchler,
1999; Fuligni, Tseng, & Lam, 1999; Phillips, de
Ardon, Komnenich, Killeen, & Rusinak, 2000).
These differences are usually attributed to variations
in cultural beliefs regarding individualism and col-
lectivism—ethnic groups from collectivistic back-
grounds are expected to hold more favorable views
about intergenerational aid and be more likely to
provide intergenerational assistance than groups
from individualistic backgrounds.
For instance, White European Americans are
believed to hold individualistic values that empha-
size personal responsibility, independence, and the
notion that older adults are expected to take care of
themselves for as long as they possibly can (Pyke &
Bengtson, 1996; Triandis, 2001). In contrast, Asian
cultures teach filial piety as a value, which includes
the belief that children must support and assist par-
ents (e.g., Hsu & Shyu, 2003; Kim & Ahn, 2001).
Latin American cultures traditionally have held
strong familistic values that include loyalty and
responsibilities to help kin (Aranda & Knight, 1997).
The concept of ‘‘la familia’’ (i.e., the family) means
that the needs of la familia are placed above individ-
ual wants and personal interests (Santiago-Rivera,
*This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Aging (AG17967).
**Marilyn Coleman is a Curators’ Professor of Human Development and Family Studies at University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211(colemanma@missouri.edu).
Lawrence H. Ganongis Professor of Human Development at the School of Nursing at Universityof Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 (ganongl@missouri.edu). Tanja C.
Rothrauff is a Graduate Research Assistant in Human Development and Family Studies at University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 (tcrp6d@mizzou.edu).
Family Relations, 55 (December 2006), 576–587. Blackwell Publishing.
Copyright 2006 by the National Council on Family Relations.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex