Quality review and confidentiality laws.

AuthorBushnell, Willet R.

In preparing for reviews under the new AICPA Guidelines for Voluntary Tax Practice Review, a firm needs to plan to avoid possible problems with state confidentiality statutes. When preparing quality control documents and reviewing a practice using the guidelines for a self-review, items that would affect the firm in an outside review must also be addressed. The first major stumbling block is state law. For example, in Spring 1991, Alaska passed a new accountancy act. Much attention was given to the new quality review provisions governing accounting and auditing practices. In defining those sections, the confidentiality section of the new law was changed to allow disclosure of client information during a quality review pursuant to state law. The effect of this provision is that this disclosure applies only when the quality review is performed under the mandatory provisions of Alaska law and the review work is done by a person who holds a certificate in the state. Luckily, the statute does have a provision that allows the release of information if it is authorized by the client.

A review of other states discloses that Alaska is not alone in its provisions regarding confidentiality. At least 19 jurisdictions (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Puerto Rico) have some form of accountants' confidentiality statute. Each state statute differs and the regulations may restrict or allow quality reviews.

In the future, state boards may adopt regulations and statutes to allow disclosure of information in a review as the AICPA quality review program and reviews under the Voluntary Tax Practice Review (VTPR) encounter these problems.

At this point, practitioners are faced with several choices for a VTPR. The first choice is to scale down the scope of the review to limit it to an administrative review. A tax practice administrative review is designed so that reviewers will not need access to any client information. An administrative review concentrates on tax practice policies and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT