Puerto Rico’s Summer 2019 Uprising and the Crisis of Colonialism

DOI10.1177/0094582X20906509
Published date01 May 2020
Date01 May 2020
AuthorPedro Cabán
Subject MatterCommentaries
https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X20906509
LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES, Issue 232, Vol. 47 No. 3, May 2020, 103–116
DOI: 10.1177/0094582X20906509
© 2020 Latin American Perspectives
103
Commentary
Puerto Rico’s Summer 2019 Uprising and the Crisis of
Colonialism
by
Pedro Cabán
July 22, 2019, was a watershed moment in Puerto Rico’s history. On that day
Puerto Ricans by the hundreds of thousands marched and demanded the res-
ignation of Ricardo Rosselló Nevares, the colony’s inept and ethically bankrupt
governor. On August 2 the pro-statehood governor became the first elected
governor of Puerto Rico to resign his office.
In the summer of 2019 Puerto Ricans repudiated the entrenched and self-
perpetuating political class for its unfathomable venality, incompetence, and
hubris. Puerto Rico’s political institutions were shaken, many of its leaders
were discredited, and the legitimacy of the entire colonial regime rapidly
eroded. Ironically, the Obama and Trump administrations may have embold-
ened the popular uprising. On June 30, 2016, President Obama signed into law
the Puerto Rican Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act
(PROMESA), a law designed to maximize the extraction of wealth from Puerto
Rico to pay down the massive debt (estimated at US$74 billion) accumulated
by successive Puerto Rican governments. PROMESA stripped the colonial gov-
ernment of its fiscal powers and created a financial control board (hereafter the
junta) that is reviled by the populace for imposing crushing austerity that is
impoverishing the archipelago. PROMESA was in effect a declaration that
Puerto Rico’s political class could not be trusted to manage the colony in the
interests of U.S. capital.
The United States also had serious management issues of its own in dealing
with the colony. The botched response of the Federal Emergency Management
Administration (FEMA) to the disaster caused by Hurricane María revealed
that the Trump administration was incapable of managing Puerto Rico’s recov-
ery. FEMA was beset by the same unpreparedness, incompetence, and lack of
planning that Trump insisted was uniquely Puerto Rican. It was lambasted for
its failure to provide timely relief and for a callously bureaucratic emergency
response to the devastation caused by the hurricane on September 20, 2017. An
internal investigation in fact documents the agency’s numerous failings
(Sullivan, 2018). FEMA ultimately bears much responsibility for nearly 5,000
deaths (Kishore etal., 2018). Through sheer braggadocio and outright fabrica-
tions, Trump triumphantly proclaimed that FEMA’s response was an “incred-
ible success” (Gambino, 2018). In characteristic fashion, he tweeted that Puerto
906509LAPXXX10.1177/0094582X20906509Latin American PerspectivesCabán/Commentary
research-article2020
Pedro Cabán is a professor of Latin American, Caribbean, and Latina/o studies at the University
at Albany.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT