Public Interest in Veterans’ Lottery Tickets

DOI10.1177/0095327X17708561
AuthorDavid M. Yaskewich
Date01 July 2018
Published date01 July 2018
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Public Interest in
Veterans’ Lottery
Tickets: Evidence From
Consumer and Voter
Behavior
David M. Yaskewich
1
Abstract
While many states earmark lottery proceeds for education programs, a few states
have started allocating portions of lottery revenues toward state-provided services
for military veterans. The decision to shift funds toward veterans’ services and away
from other programs creates an opportunity to study society’s willingness to help
veterans when faced with real trade-offs. Using county-level data from three states,
I examined public interest in veterans’ lottery tickets by analyzing consumer and
voter behaviors. In two states that sold veterans’ tickets, IA and TX, a similar set of
county-level variables explained variation in both veterans’ and nonveterans’ ticket
sales. However, there were a few cases in which sales patterns differed across ticket
categories. Election results from a statewide referendum in MO to create a veterans’
lottery ticket suggested that opposition came from counties with a large proportion
of college graduates and high population densities.
Keywords
lottery, public opinion, veterans, voting, ballot initiatives
1
Department of Economics, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA
Corresponding Author:
David M. Yaskewich, Department of Economics, Southeast Missouri State University, One University
Plaza, Mailstop #5845, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, USA.
Email: dyaskewich@semo.edu
Armed Forces & Society
2018, Vol. 44(3) 408-435
ªThe Author(s) 2017
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X17708561
journals.sagepub.com/home/afs
While most government-sponsored benefit programs for veterans are funded at the
federal level, state governments have used their own tax revenues to fund a variety of
benefits for veterans. Simila r to the intention of federal benefi t programs, state
efforts have tended to target elderly veterans with health problems and younger
veterans who lack financial maturity. A common and expensive service is the oper-
ation of state-run nursing homes for veterans. Some states also provide veterans with
other services such as financial assistance for first-time home purchases and educa-
tional costs at public colleges, one-on-one assistance with job searching and apply-
ing for government benefits, and the maintenance of veterans’ cemeteries. The
demand for these services likely changes over the next decade along with the age
profile of the U.S. veteran population. As ongoing conflicts continue to generate new
post-9/11-era veterans below age 35, albeit at a declining pace, aging veterans from
the Vietnam era and earlier cause modest growth in the proportion of veterans at or
above age 65. According to projections by RAND Health (2015), the two largest
groups of veterans by 2024 come from the Vietnam and post-9/11 eras, which
account for 29%and 24%of the total veteran population, respectively.
In an effort to provide a stream of supplemental funding for veterans’ services, a
small number of states have enacted laws requiring a portion of revenue from lottery
ticket sales to be allocated for this purpose. Currently, these laws have been adopted
by only six states that include IL, IA, KS, OR, TX, and WV.
1
Proposals to introduce
veteran-specific lottery tickets have failed to generate enough support in other states
by both lawmakers in a state legislature (PA) and voters in a statewide referendum
(MO). Some opponents of the use of lottery tickets to fund veterans’ programs have
been concerned about the potential trade-off with funding other state programs, such
as K–12 or college education programs.
Recent efforts by states to help veterans with lottery proceeds have created a
unique opportunity to study how society shows supports for veterans when presented
with real trade-offs. Previous studies by social scientists have examined the possi-
bility that society discriminates either in favor of or against veterans compared to
nonveterans in a variety of environments. Examples of some studies include anal-
yses of how employers treat veterans who are employees or job applicants (Da´vila &
Mora, 2012; Kleykamp, 2009), voters treat veterans who are political candidates
(Karsten, 2012; McDermott & Panagopoulos, 2015; Teigen, 2012), prosecutors treat
veterans who are defendants in criminal trials (Wilson, Brodsky, Neal, & Cramer,
2011), and journalists treat veterans in writing news articles (Kleykamp & Hipes,
2015). This article contributes to this body of literature by analyzing support for
veterans in two additional environments: (1) product markets in which these veter-
ans’ lottery tickets are sold and (2) a statewide referendum to create a lottery ticket
with proceeds benefiting veteran s’ services. Using county-level d ata from three
states, the primary focus of this article is to identify characteristics of county popu-
lations that increase the intensity of support for veterans.
The analysis on public support for veterans in this article can be divided into two
parts. The first part of this study estimated the relationships between county-level
Yaskewich 409

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT