Public Administration Training in Basic Police Academies: A 50-State Comparative Analysis

Published date01 July 2021
AuthorGalia Cohen
DOI10.1177/0275074021999872
Date01 July 2021
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074021999872
American Review of Public Administration
2021, Vol. 51(5) 345 –359
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0275074021999872
journals.sagepub.com/home/arp
Article
The importance of public employees training has long been
recognized. As Nanekar (1973) explains, whether it is “rail-
way administration, police administration, social service
administration . . . in all these functions, one factor—admin-
istration—is common “ (p. 56), and, regardless of the func-
tion administrators may be trained, they must be trained in
how to administer it. The rationale behind the need for pub-
lic administration training is simple; communities want to
build a workforce of qualified and competent public ser-
vants who possess the critical knowledge, skills, and atti-
tudes they need to perform their job effectively and deliver
quality public service.
Public administration training as a key approach for train-
ing government employees received a symbolic meaning
when President Carter excluded business major interns from
his Presidential Management Intern Program (McCurdy,
1978). Today, professional fields across the public sector
incorporate public administration content in their training to
teach their employees attitudes and awareness of public ser-
vice principles, such as ethical decision making, social
equity, racial relations, impartiality, and cultural diversity.
While such values and skills are important for all public
employees, as well as for humanity as a whole (Averch &
Dluhy, 1992); they are especially critical for police profes-
sionals as they face some of the most serious challenges and
criticisms of today.
The idea that police officers “make policy” is not new.
Standing on the frontlines of public-sector personnel (Lipsky,
2010), scholars have portrayed police officers as “street-
level bureaucrats” (SLBs; Lipsky, 1971), “boundary-span-
ners personnel” (Aldrich & Reiss, 1972), and even
“soldier-bureaucrats” (Makin, 2016) who, perhaps more than
any other group of SLBs, are entrusted with high levels of
discretionary powers which they are often forced to exercise
within split seconds and under a great deal of pressure
(Cohen, 2018). Clearly, police officers’ ability to execute
their discretionary powers and make ethical and effective
decisions has a significant impact on the delivery of public
999872ARPXXX10.1177/0275074021999872The American Review of Public AdministrationCohen
research-article2021
1Tarleton State University, Fort Worth, TX, USA
Corresponding Author:
Galia Cohen, Tarleton State University, 10850 Texan Rider Dr., Fort
Worth, TX 76036, USA.
Email: cohen@tarleton.edu
Public Administration Training
in Basic Police Academies:
A 50-State Comparative Analysis
Galia Cohen1
Abstract
Recent controversial interactions of police with the public have become an issue of important concern for public and
governmental leaders, who have openly questioned current models of police training and their effectiveness. This study is
asking whether basic police academies utilize curricula that reflect the contemporary challenges of modern policing today and
prepare recruits to become not only police officers but also competent and skilled, street-level bureaucrats who can provide
an effective and impartial service to their increasingly diverse communities. The aim of this study is to quantify, analyze, and
compare the content dedicated to the public administration domain in state-mandated basic training curricula across all 50
states. The study utilizes a mixed-methods research design with content analysis. Data were generated from 49 basic training
curricula (with one state not having mandated training standards) and 17 interviews with police training officials. The result
shows that despite the paradigm shift in the role of the modern-day police officer, police academies have made little to no
progress in bridging the gap between the academy curriculum and the practicality of police work. On average, only 3.21% of
basic training curricula are explicitly dedicated to public administration training—a training focused on public service values
of fundamental importance to the practice of law enforcement. This article gives public administration scholars a voice in the
national debate about the crisis in police–public relations by contributing to the literature on police training reform from a
much-needed public administration lens.
Keywords
police reform, police training, public administration training, basic police academy, curricula, content analysis, public value

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT