Prudence and Precautionary Effort

Date01 March 2019
Published date01 March 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12204
AuthorKangoh Lee
©2017 The Journal of Risk and Insurance. Vol.86, No. 1, 151–163 (2019).
DOI: 10.1111/jori.12204
Prudence and Precautionary Effort
Kangoh Lee
Abstract
It is well known that prudence increases precautionary effort in the presence
of future uncertain income. This result is intuitive, as prudent individuals
take more caution to reduce the probability of accident in response to in-
come uncertainty.However, this known result holds true only in a two-state
model with either a loss or no loss occurring. With more than two states
of the world, losses of different magnitudes occur, and precautionary effort
may not reduce the probabilitiesof all losses. The effect of income uncertainty
on precautionary effort hinges on how it affects the probability distribution
of losses, and prudence is neither necessary nor sufficient for more precau-
tion. The analysis establishes an intuitive condition under which prudence
increases precaution and another one under which prudence decreases it.
Introduction
The notion of risk aversion has been firmly established in economics, finance, and
psychology,but higher-order risk preferences such as prudence and temperance have
received a good deal of attention only recently (Deck and Schlesinger,2010; Ebert and
Wiesen, 2014; Noussair, Trautmann, and Van De Kuilen, 2014). Such preferences play
an important role in the analysis of various issues related to risk and uncertainty.
For instance, prudent individuals increase their saving when their future income
becomes uncertain, but imprudent individuals decrease their saving (Kimball, 1990,
Guiso, Jappelli, and Terlizzese, 1992; Gollier, 2001, Chap. 16; Giles and Yoo, 2007;
Hurst et al., 2010; Crainich, Eeckhoudt, and Trannoy, 2013).
More recently, a literature has extended saving decisions to precautionary effort (self-
protection or prevention) decisions, and has shown that prudent individuals increase
precautionary effort to reduce the probability of loss when their future income be-
comes uncertain (Eeckhoudt, Huang, and Tzeng, 2012; Nocetti, 2015; Wang and Li,
2015). This literature departs from the existing literature on prevention in an im-
portant way.Since the inception of the idea of prevention, namely self-insurance and
self-protection, by Ehrlich and Becker (1972), the existing literature has studied the de-
cisions to invest in prevention in one-period models. For instance, regardingprudence
or income uncertainty,Eeckhoudt and Gollier (2005) study the effects of prudence on
Kangoh Lee is in the Department of Economics, San Diego State University. Lee can be con-
tacted via e-mail: klee@mail.sdsu.edu. I am grateful to a co-editor of the journal for his helpful
comments that improved the article significantly.
151

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT