The Protestant roots of American civil religion.

AuthorMoots, Glenn A.
PositionEssay

Not all civil religion is a threat to civil society, nor should civil religion be discouraged in all circumstances. But when civil religion invites a sense of national exceptionalism that undermines prudent Augustinian limits on state power, it threatens civil society and ordered liberty. This article presents historical and theological background of Reformed Protestantism or "Calvinism" in America and evaluates its virtues and vices in the development of Anglo-American political theology and civil religion. The great challenge of America can be summarized in terms of the covenant theology of Reformed Protestantism. Does America enjoy the same covenant relationship as the church, an everlasting and unconditional covenant? Or is America in a relationship with God governed only by general providence and a conditional covenant? These were theological questions that eventually came to form the dilemma of American civil religion and its growing sense of divine mission.

Introduction: Christian America?

Is America a "Christian nation"? Alexis de Tocqueville recognized the role of Christianity in America's dominant ethos and argued that it is the faithful spirit of Americans that keeps us from democratic despotism, withdrawn individualism, and materialism. G. K. Chesterton called America a nation with the soul of a church. (1) These kinds of observations reinforce what Henry Van Til (2) or Russell Kirk (3) argued concerning the close relationship of religion, culture, and political institutions. Indeed, one is hard pressed to deny that Christian character and thinking has had a salutary effect on the Anglo-American legacy of institutions and habits supporting ordered liberty.

But the insights of cultural observers and historians are not the same as the assertion that America is a "Christian nation." When one moves from merely descriptive observations of history and culture to something that sounds more exclusive and prescriptive--something that asserts America to be essentially Christian--embarrassing ideological arguments multiply. Proponents and opponents of "Christian America" trade salvos of cherry-picked quotations, statistics, and anecdotes. Partisans cite everything from polling numbers counting persons who "believe in God" (something that hardly can be called the equivalent of rich Christian orthodoxy) to disputes over the contents of eighteenth-century commonplace books owned by America's constitutional framers. Perhaps these debates about America's status as a "Christian nation" are providentially intended to reinforce Solomon's warning that "of the making of many books there is no end." (4)

Whatever the merit of the claim that America can be called a Christian nation, this much is for sure: Americans are fish swimming in a civil religion that is not the same as Christianity. (5) And most of the fish don't know they're wet. Given the prevalence of civil religion in America, it is worth inquiring into its origins and its potential to do good or ill to America, to the church, and to the church's partners in civil society.

Defining Civil Religion

I do not use this term coined by Robert Bellah, "civil religion," to mean simply that religious ideas and political ideas intersect in America, or to say that American political rhetoric is religious. That would be stating the obvious. Theological or ecclesiastical support has traditionally been used to preserve public order or meet similar needs of the res publica, but the kind of civil religion of which I am speaking deviates in two important ways. First, it risks advancing political goals imprudent for a sound commonwealth by discarding traditional Augustinian pessimism and thereby enabling limitless civil power. (6) Second, it suggests delegating to the state work previously delegated to the church and to other institutions of civil society. (7) These institutions are the "little platoons" of society that Edmund Burke praised as the root of our public affection--the kind of affection that effects the greatest public good. (8)

What I mean by "civil religion," therefore, is a set of moral imperatives expressed in religious language and intended to frame and motivate public policy. These moral imperatives are cast in religious (scriptural or theological) terms and implicitly or deliberately supplant the historical work of civil society with intervention by the civil magistrate--what Max Weber defined in Politics as a Vocation as the "monopoly of force." At its very worst, civil religion becomes the establishment of a competing and false religion providing an ersatz theological justification for imprudent centralized power or imperial ambitions. Modern civil religion attempts the kind of heresy sought by a Rousseau in order to boost the health of the limitless state, not an Augustinian state aspiring merely to keep the peace and preserve civil society. The civil religion of the philosophe or the vain and ambitious ruler aspires to define the moral teleology of human beings. Struggles over civil religion therefore reach down to the very basis of human nature and the limit of politics.

The definition of "civil religion" I am advocating makes an important distinction not only because civil society and the state are very different from one another in terms of their teleologies and foundations. My definition also recognizes that the state has the potential to crowd out vital humane elements of civil society. While scholars should study civil religion just as they should study other historical or social phenomena, there is an important normative question that they should also ask. What does a society lose when its civil religion has a deleterious effect on the unique and invaluable work of civil society, including the especially salutary work of the church? The faithful man or woman in particular must ask what happens when civil theology crowds out traditional theology and the mansions of heaven are traded for public housing.

It is not enough to study "civil religion" as intersecting phenomena ("politics and religion") or as another variety of public rhetoric. The scholar must also investigate its consequence for law and society. One should not define "civil religion" so broadly that it simply denotes the ideas that any group of citizens holds in common. Every nation then has a civil religion. When used in this way, civil religion becomes as common as any sociological or political component of society. Common sense suggests that citizens of every nation must have some common set of principles, especially those (such as in America) who do not have a particular uniform ethnicity or long historical heritage on which to draw. One might be tempted to get some mileage out of the term "religion" by comparing subscribing to such principles with subscribing to particular church dogmas. "Civil religion" would then mean the set of ideas that the nation, like the church, relies on for continuity and fellowship. But one could just as easily compare the nation with any other organization that has bylaws or common purposes. Religions require subscription to common beliefs and goals, but so do tree house clubs and Red Hat Societies. If, then, "civil religion" connotes nothing more specific than adherence to a broad set of beliefs, one might as usefully use terms such as "civil tree house club" or "Civil Red Hat Society," which for obvious reasons no one does.

Admittedly, a nation's civil "creed" (the broad and common ideas of the citizenry) may owe essential elements to particular religious dogmas or doctrines. Samuel Huntington argues that such a connection exists in America. (9) But current usages of the term "civil religion" are so broad that almost any category of political practice or belief can be tied to or equated with religious practice or belief. Consider an assertion, for example, that a broad public religious consensus sustains a broad "ism" such as republicanism, constitutionalism, federalism, or classical liberalism. Demonstrating that this relationship exists requires heavy lifting followed by juggling. One must first define the aforementioned "ism" (e.g., federalism, republicanism) and then the foundational creed (e.g., Christianity) and then try to connect the latter and the former. While it seems perfectly reasonable to argue (as many have) that Christianity supports many of the aforementioned "isms," how does one isolate one particular correlation and make it the effectual cause? And how does one establish that "Christianity" supports a particular "ism" when it is hard enough to determine what the faithful believe? After all, most Americans recently polled think that the phrase "God helps those who help themselves" can be found in the Bible. (10) This makes them adherents of Poor Richard's Almanac, and therefore adherents of a moralistic commercial republic. But this hardly constitutes a link between authentic Christianity and republicanism or commercialism. (11)

Given these aforementioned difficulties, the scholar attempting to link "Christianity" to various isms must undertake the unenviable task of defining at one and the same time the political idea (e.g., republicanism, federalism) and the foundational idea (e.g., Christianity). All of this explains why the notion of "Christian America" can be endlessly misleading. One must define "Christianity," "America," and the supposed attributes and "isms" of America (real or imagined) simultaneously. Historical cases and quotations seem to bolster all interpretations. Pitfalls are everywhere. However, if we can argue about whether particular religious rhetoric has advanced particular policy goals (e.g., the annexing of Hawaii or creation of progressive tax policy), we move from defining broad movements or ideas ("isms") to events into which we can sink our historical teeth.

How Religion Comes to Support Policy: The Root of Civil Religion

Here I shall discuss three ways that religious ideas become supports for...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT