Prosecuting Military Sexual Assault: The Entanglement of Military Discourse and Victim Stereotypes in Prosecutor Case Strategies

Published date01 December 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/15570851231197913
AuthorStephanie Bonnes,Samantha A. Tosto
Date01 December 2023
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Feminist Criminology
2023, Vol. 18(5) 459489
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/15570851231197913
journals.sagepub.com/home/fcx
Prosecuting Military Sexual
Assault: The Entanglement of
Military Discourse and Victim
Stereotypes in Prosecutor
Case Strategies
Stephanie Bonnes
1
and Samantha A. Tosto
1
Abstract
High rates of sexual assault within the United States Armed Forces have led to several
initiatives designed to combat sexual violence and increase prosecution of perpe-
trators. While scholars argue that the militarys hypermasculine culture contributes to
high rates of victimization, less is known about how this culture impacts each case
within the military justice system. Using in-depth interviews, we explore how military
prosecutors develop strategies to navigate this uniquely gendered terrain as it in-
tersects with victim stereotypes. Findings suggest that prosecutors invoke military
discourse to combat rape myths but are constrained by gendered assumptions of the
ideal servicemember.
Keywords
sexual assault, military justice, victimization, prosecutors, gender
Introduction
Pervasive sexual violence in the United States Armed Forces is a well-documented
phenomenon that disproportionately affects servicewomen. It is estimated that
1
University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA
Corresponding Author:
Stephanie Bonnes, University of New Haven, 300 Boston Post Road, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
Email: sbonnes@newhaven.edu
approximately 8.5% of active-duty women (N= 19,255) and 1.5% of active-duty men
(N= 16,620) experienced some form of sexual victimization in 2021 (DoD, 2022a).
Research suggests that up to 36% of women who enter the military will expe rience an
attempted or completed rape during their service (Bostock & Daley, 2007;Edmonds
et al., 2021;Sadler et al., 2003,2017;Stander & Thomsen, 2016;Turchik & Wilson,
2010). In response to this issue, over the last decade the military has created educational
programs designed to decrease sexual assault, enhanced reporting streams, and adopted
policies to help victims navigate the militarys criminal legal system. The military offers
healthcare, mental health support, victim advocacy, and legal services to those who
report and for victims who use unrestricted reporting, legal action can be taken against
the accused. It is estimated that one in f‌ive victims of military sexual violence report to a
military authority f‌igure, with women reporting at three times the rate of men (DoD,
2022a). In 2021, 67% of these reported cases of sexual assault resulted in disciplinary
action, 33% of cases had insuff‌icient evidence to prosecute, and 2% of cases were
deemed unfounded (DoD, 2022c). In a sample of 585 sexual assault reports from a U.S.
military base in Japan, Warner and Armstrong (2020) found a 14.7% conviction rate.
While the Department of Defense tracks information about sexual assault reports, we
know little about the legal professionals making recommendations based on case
evidence and their strategies at court-martial.
The #metoo movement
1
has been credited with enhancing overall public awareness
of pervasive sexual violence against women, which has led to increased reporting and
changes in sexual assault policies and laws in the United States (Nicolaou & Smith,
2019). The harassment and murder of Spc. Vanessa Guill´
en in 2020 by another soldier
reignited the #metoomilitary movement and sparked the #IamVanessaGuill´
en move-
ment within the military system, leading servicewomen to share their stories of ha-
rassment and sexual violence on social media (Coronado, 2020). Despite the efforts of
these social media movements to foster dialogue on gender inequality and sexual
violence in the military, the Department of Defense has observed a decrease in the
reporting rate of sexual assault cases in the years following the #metoo movement. In
2016 and 2018, an estimated one in three victims reported their experiences, whereas in
2021, the estimated reporting rate dropped to one in f‌ive victims (DoD 2022b). This
estimated decrease in reporting might be related to a decline in servicewomens
conf‌idence in the militarys capacity to adequately respond to sexual assault. Compared
to previous years, fewer women in service academies in 2021 indicated that they trusted
the military to maintain their privacy, ensure their safety, and to treat them with dignity
and respect if they reported sexual assault (DoD 2022a). Similarly, 47% of active-duty
servicewomen in 2021 cited fear of negative consequences as a barrier to reporting
sexual assault (DoD 2022b). These fears are not unwarranted as 67% of women who
did report unwanted sexual contact in 2021 believed that they were retaliated against for
doing so (DoD 2022c). The lack of trust in the militarys response to sexual assault
underscores the importance of understanding how those prosecuting sexual assault
cases approach and understand this work.
460 Feminist Criminology 18(5)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT