PREMISES LIABILITY. Hazardous Premises. DEFENDANTS VERDICT

Pages22-23
The plaintiff alleged that the defendants were negli-
gent in failing to properly maintain the sidewalk, fail-
ing to warn of the dangerous condition, failing to
barricade or block off the dangerous condition, and
failing to make proper inspections and repairs to the
sidewalk. As a result of the fall, the plaintiff suffered a
fracture of a metacarpal, requiring open reduction
and internal fixation. The plaintiff maintained that she
has been left with a permanent disability of the hand,
as a result. The defendants denied that a dangerous
condition existed on the premises, and argued that
the elevation was trivial, and did not require repair or
constitute a dangerous condition. In addition, the de-
fendants maintained that the plaintiff was non-com-
pliant with her medical care, leading to any residual
injury claimed.
The jury found no negligence against the defendants.
REFERENCE
Debbie and Billie McAdams vs. Michael and Linda
Ma Chan. Case no. 121201416; Judge Karen
Shreeves Johns, 08-27-14.
Attorney for plaintiff: Jason Fine of Master,
Weinstein, Schatz & Moyer in Philadelphia, PA.
Attorney for defendant: Lauren R. Clein of Thomas,
Thomas & Hafer in Philadelphia, PA.
DEFENDANT’S VERDICT
Premises Liability – Negligent maintenance of
machine – Plaintiff slips on accumulated water
that leaked from a boiler defendants had recently
repaired – Failure to properly maintain and repair
boiler – Lumbar disc injuries requiring surgery –
Radiculopathy
Philadelphia County, PA
The plaintiff, in this negligence action, was at her
place of employment when she slipped and fell in
a puddle of water that had leaked from a boiler
that had recently been serviced by the defendant
maintenance company. The defendant denied
being negligent, and that the plaintiff’s injuries
were causally related to the fall.
On December 8, 2010, the female plaintiff was walk-
ing through the kitchen at her place of employment
when she slipped and fell on water that had accu-
mulated as a result of a leaking boiler. The defendant
company had been called to make repairs to the
boiler in November of 2010, and had performed re-
pairs and maintenance on the machine on Novem-
ber 19, 2010. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant
company was negligent in failing to adequately
maintain said machine, failing to warn of the danger-
ous condition of the machine, failing to fix the defec-
tive condition of the machine, and creating a
dangerous condition. The plaintiff maintained that af-
ter the fall, she was diagnosed with disc herniations
and/or bulges at L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1 requiring surgery,
and radicular symptoms in legs. The defendant de-
nied all liability and injury, and argued that they had
no notice of the condition as the boiler had been
functioning properly after the defendant repaired the
boiler in November of 2010.
The jury found no negligence against the defendant.
REFERENCE
Ambrey Miller vs. Precision Service Company. Case
no. 121200542; Judge Rosalyn Robinson, 08-21-14.
Attorney for plaintiff: Joseph Feliciani of Creedon
and Feliciani, P. C., in Norristown, PA. Attorney for
defendant: Harold Viletto of Weinraub & Miller in
Norristown, PA.
Hazardous Premises
DEFENDANTS VERDICT
Premises Liability – Hazardous Premises – While
standing in line to purchase baseball tickets,
plaintiff trips and falls over a cable – Creating a
hazardous and dangerous condition – Achilles
tendon tear – Lumbar sprain – Contusions and
abrasions
Philadelphia County, PA
In this premises liability action, the male plaintiff
alleged that both the defendant ballpark and the
defendant news company created a hazardous
condition by allowing a cable wire to be stretched
across a walkway where visitors were waiting in
line to buy baseball tickets. As a result of the wire,
the plaintiff tripped and fell, sustaining injuries.
Both defendants denied all allegations of
negligence, and denied that the plaintiff was hurt
in the incident.
On February 7, 2011, the male plaintiff went to the
defendants ballpark in the early morning hours to
stand in a line in order to purchase tickets for the up-
coming baseball season. While moving in the line,
the plaintiff tripped and fell over the defendant news
companys cable that was stretched across the walk-
way where the line was formed. The plaintiff brought
negligence claims against both defendants, alleging
22 VERDICTS BY CATEGORY
Volume 33, Issue 3, February 2015 Subscribe Now

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT