Preferences nullified: SCOTUS vs. affirmative action.

AuthorRoot, Damon
PositionCitings - Brief article

In November 2006, by a margin of 58 percent to 42 percent, Michigan voters endorsed Proposition 2, a ballot initiative aimed at amending the state constitution in order to make it illegal for state officials, including those who work at state universities, colleges, and local public school districts, "to discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin." In effect, the amendment prohibited the use of affirmative action in public education.

A group of plaintiffs led by the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights, and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary promptly challenged the law in federal court, eventually scoring a significant victory at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, which held that Proposition 2 violated the 14th...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT