Practical Tools

AuthorErika Harmon Arner - Kathleen A. Daley - Michael J. Flibbert
Pages109-236
One of the most daunting tasks for practitioners before the Board is synthe-
sizing the many different rules that apply to each proceeding. In addition
to the statutes, there are “umbrella” rules that apply to all Board trials;
rules that apply only to IPR, PGR, or CBM-PGR proceedings; and a Patent
Trial Practice Guide that explains and interprets the rules. The Ofce also
provides a wealth of commentary in the rule-making process and informal
guidance in the form of presentations and training materials published
on the Ofce’s website. And, of course, much can be learned from Board
orders and decisions.
This chapter provides a comprehensive collection of all signicant Ofce
guidance for Board practice, organized by topic. Each topic is organized
according to the following framework:1
• Recitation of a rule
• Published responses to comments pertaining to the rule2
1. IPR-specic rules often mirror PGR-specic rules, and vice versa. Accordingly, commen-
tary, orders, and decisions addressing IPR-specic rules may be relevant to PGR-specic rules.
Similarly, commentary, orders, and decisions addressing PGR-specic rules may be relevant to
IPR-specic rules. Thus, IPR-specic sections of this chapter sometimes refer to PGR-specic
commentary, decisions, and orders. Likewise, PGR-specic sections of this chapter sometimes
refer to IPR-specic commentary, decisions, and orders.
2. For convenience and readability, individual citations to each of the listed responses to
comments are not provided in the text.
109
Chapter 5
Practical Tools
ame5571_05_ch05_109-236.indd 109 9/30/16 2:36 PM
Designates responses to comments provided in the Rules of Prac-
tice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Judicial
Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions, 77 Federal Reg
-
ister 157, 48612 (Aug. 14, 2012)
Designates responses to comments provided in the Changes to
Implement Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Post-Grant Review Pro-
ceedings, and Transitional Program for Covered Business Method
Patents, 77 Federal Register 157, 48680 (Aug. 14, 2012)
Designates responses to comments provided in the Transitional Pro-
gram for Covered Business Method Patents—Denitions of Covered
Business Method Patent and Technological Invention, 77 Federal
Register 157, 48734 (Aug. 14, 2012)
Designates responses to comments provided in the Amendments to
the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal
Board; Proposed Rules, 80 Federal Register 161, 50720 (Aug. 20,
2015)
Designates responses to comments provided in the Amendments to
the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal
Board, 81 Federal Register 63, 18750 (Apr. 1, 2016)
Precedential, informative, or representative decisions/orders pertain-
ing to the rule
Portions of the Ofce Patent Trial Practice Guide pertaining to the rule
3
• Informal Guidance pertaining to the rule
At the end of the chapter, following the comprehensive collection of
Ofce guidance, are several practice tools, including handy checklists of
must-have items for each stage of a Board trial, Board time lines, and Board
contact information.
3. For convenience and readability, individual citations to the Ofce Patent Trial Practice
Guide pinpoint pages from 77 Federal Register 157, 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012).
CHAPTER 5
110
ame5571_05_ch05_109-236.indd 110 9/30/16 2:36 PM
A. Ofce Guidance on Patent Trials
Referred to by the Ofce as “umbrella” rules, the rules and guidance in
this section apply to all Board trials, including IPR, PGR, and CBM-PGR.
1. Trial Rules
a. Rules of Construction; Burden of Proof
Rule: § 42.1 Policy.4
(a) Scope. Part 42 governs proceedings before the Patent Trial and
Appeal Board. Sections 1.4, 1.7, 1.14, 1.16, 1.22, 1.23, 1.25, 1.26,
1.32, 1.34, and 1.36 of this chapter also apply to proceedings before
the Board, as do other sections of part 1 of this chapter that are incor-
porated by reference into this part.
(b) Construction. This part shall be construed to secure the just, speedy,
and inexpensive resolution of every proceeding.
(c) Decorum. Every party must act with courtesy and decorum in all
proceedings before the Board, including in interactions with other
parties.
(d) Evidentiary standard. The default evidentiary standard is a pre-
ponderance of the evidence.
Comments
1—Burden of persuasion does not shift to the patentee upon ling
amended claims. Instead, the patentee must include a statement of
the precise relief requested and a full statement of the reasons for the
relief requested.
2—The Board will construe the rules to secure the just, speedy, and
inexpensive resolution of every proceeding.
b. Denitions
Rule: § 42.2 Denitions.5
4. According to the Ofce, this rule is consistent with 35 U.S.C. §§ 135, 316, 326.
5. According to the Ofce, this rule is consistent with 35 U.S.C. §§ 6, 135, 311, 318,
321, 328.
111
PRACTICAL TOOLS
ame5571_05_ch05_109-236.indd 111 9/30/16 2:36 PM

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT