Post‐1994 South Africa's peacekeeping and military intervention in Southern Africa, reference from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Lesotho

AuthorToyin Cotties Adetiba,Daniel N. Mlambo
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1984
Date01 February 2020
Published date01 February 2020
ACADEMIC PAPER
Post1994 South Africa's peacekeeping and military
intervention in Southern Africa, reference from the
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Lesotho
Daniel N. Mlambo
1
|Toyin Cotties Adetiba
2
1
Department of Public Administration,
University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, South
Africa
2
Department of Politics and International
Studies, University of Zululand,
KwaDlangezwa, South Africa
Correspondence
Daniel N. Mlambo, Department of Public
Administration, University of Zululand,
KwaDlangezwa, South Africa 3886.
Email: mlambo1@ymail.com
South Africa, once a pariah state as a result of the apartheid regime destabilization
policies in Southern Africa, became a full fledge democratic state following the victory
of the African National Congress (ANC) in the first and allinclusive democratic elec-
tions of 1994. The ANC's vision for Southern Africa was to be routed on the notion of
curbing the imbalances of the past (pre1994), which had cost the Southern African
region great economic loss. Here, one of the many fundamentals that were to drive
the ANC's foreign policy doctrine was that of conflict resolution for a more stable
and prosperous Africa particularly Southern Africa. Conflict resolution was viewed
as a pivotal element for the new democratic government in order to stimulate
beneficial relations with other African states post the apartheid era. In light of the
above, and using a qualitative method approach, this paper draws a nuanced appraisal
and examines the role of South Africa's peacekeeping and mediation initiatives in the
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Lesotho post1994. In conclusion, South
Africa has been able to utilize its regional hegemonic stance to ensure regional
security while ensuring economic stability at home.
1|INTRODUCTION
It is indisputable that several decades after the end of colonialism,
political instability has remained a core challenge for most African
states. By narrowing this down to Southern Africa, South Africa's dra-
matic transition from 1990 to 1994 not only brought with it hope and
relief to millions of South Africans but was also welcomed by the
Southern African community, Africa at large and other international
actors. Africa and Southern Africa, in particular, had suffered
immensely because of the apartheid regime destabilization policies,
which accounted for huge losses in potential economic growth
(Stanford, 1997). South Africa through its first democratically elected
president Mr Nelson Mandela (the late) was to reshape its foreign
policy doctrine towards Africa and specifically Southern Africa. This
was to be driven on the notion of beneficial arrangements driven by
mutual respect and cooperation in various aspects. Of importance
was to also (as a result of its robust economy) be a driver of regional
peace and security unlike its predecessor government (de Coning &
Lotze, 2013).
The belief and expectations of African states and the international
community that the democratic ANC government would post1994
play a vital role as a driver for democratic values, economic growth,
and political stability became a norm when Mandela became presi-
dent. This is because he had a year earlier (1993) in his article in
Foreign Affairs clearly articulated that South Africa's foreign policy
was to be driven on the pillars of promoting human rights, democracy,
the quest for peace, and the respect for international law (Mandela,
1993; Vines, 2010). Solomon (2010) submits that post1994, Pretoria
was expected to make use of its vast military and economic might to
diminish the vast conflicts that were taking place continentally. Hence,
over the years, South Africa has been involved in peacekeeping
initiatives in countries such as Angola, Burundi, the DRC, Ivory Coast,
Lesotho, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, Sudan, and Zimbabwe just to
name a few.
Received: 15 April 2019 Accepted: 9 May 2019
DOI: 10.1002/pa.1984
J Public Affairs. 2020;20:e1984.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1984
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pa 1of8

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT