Poor Mothers and Habits of Hiding: Participatory Methods in Poverty Research

Published date01 November 2005
AuthorLeah Schmalzbauer,Lisa Dodson
Date01 November 2005
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00186.x
LISA DODSON Boston College
LEAH SCHMALZBAUER Montana State University*
Poor Mothers and Habits of Hiding: Participatory
Methods in Poverty Research
Poor mothers have long-standing habits of
hiding their lives in response to punitive author-
ities and stigma. We identify practices of hiding
daily life, and we describe participatory re-
search approaches for and ethical concerns in
learning more about poor women’s critical in-
sights and survival strategies.
Poor families have long been studied in the
United States and even more so recently during
the era of welfare reform. Yet, gaining accu-
rate representations of life and learning from
people’s knowledge in poor or marginal-
ized communities can be challenging because
low-income and otherwise vulnerable people
hesitate to share their worlds. Experiences with
stigmatization (Goffman, 1963), concerns about
regulatory scrutiny and abuse (Dodson, 1998;
Soss, Schram, Vartanian, & O’Brien, 2001), and
experience with punitive authorities (Scott,
1990) all contribute to habits of hiding daily life.
In this article, we frame a theoretical discus-
sion about poor women and habits of hiding
that examines how othered people exercise cau-
tion in speaking about their lives. We identify
the context in which poor mothers withhold
information that may affect reliability in social
research and even preserve distorted images
of low-income people, in particular, people of
color. We use brief excerpts from our studies to
identify particular habits of hiding that we have
come to see as endemic in low-income com-
munities. Using scholarship on participative
research, we detail our methods in three stages
of the inquiry process that include the develop-
ment of the research design, conducting f‌ield
research, and interpreting data toward gaining
a deeper understanding of family life in contem-
porary low-income America. We conclude with
a discussion about ethical considerations and
the diff‌iculties and importance of these research
methods.
BACKGROUND
Poor women have long been called upon to pro-
vide detailed information about their families
and themselves as they seek income support,
access to health care, subsidized food, housing,
jobs, and child care (Abromovitz, 1996;
Dodson, 2005; Edin & Lein, 1996). Immigrant
and undocumented women are often called
upon to prove their citizenship status as they
seek jobs, education for their children, health
care, and income supports to manage their fami-
lies’ daily needs (Chavez, 1998; Coutin, 2000;
Schmalzbauer, in press). Beyond interviews
with off‌icials in public welfare institutions and
employers, mothers, who generally oversee
children’s everyday needs, are largely responsi-
ble for communicating with teachers and school
Sociology Department, 408 McGuinn Hall, Boston College,
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 (dodsonli@bc.edu).
*Department of Sociology and Anthropology, 2-128 Wilson
Hall, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-2380.
Key Words: participatory research, poor women, poverty,
stigma.
Journal of Marriage and Family 67 (November 2005): 949–959 949

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT