Political Inequality in the Digital World: The Puzzle of Asian American Political Participation Online

Published date01 December 2021
DOI10.1177/1065912920945391
AuthorNathan K. Chan
Date01 December 2021
Subject MatterArticles
2021, Vol. 74(4) 882 –898
https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920945391
Political Research Quarterly
© 2020 University of Utah
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1065912920945391
journals.sagepub.com/home/prq
Introduction
Asian Americans are the fastest growing racial group in
the United States. Along these lines, the overall share of
Asian Americans in the electorate has also increased
(Budiman 2020; File 2015). While voting may be one
way in which the group can make their voice heard, Asian
Americans can additionally make their impact on the
political system by participating in other activities. This
includes both electoral and non-electoral participation.
However, Asian Americans may take further political
action on the Internet. Online forms of involvement do
not restrict action by political integration nor exclude
the opportunity to participate to U.S. citizens. To include
online modes into the repertoire of Asian American polit-
ical participation is particularly important given they lead
in terms of Internet access compared to other racial
groups. While it is well documented that Asian Americans
are le it is well documented that Asian Americans are less
politically involved than their counterparts, there may be
potential to make up lost ground in expressing their voice
by taking action online. The conditions are seemingly fer-
tile for there to be a shift toward equalization of the racial
political participation gap. However, as I will lay out in
full, we should be cautious about this assumption.
There are several goals of this paper. First is to include
online activities more explicitly within the repertoire of
Asian American political participation. This is crucial as
Dalton (2017, 128) argues that the Internet “creates new
ways for people to engage politically: to connect with
others, to gather and share information, and to attempt to
influence the political process.” The second is to theorize
about the consequences of the overall Asian American
political participation gap, inclusive of digital activism.
The third is to empirically reassess the size of the racial
participation gap after accounting for both offline and
online activities. To accomplish these goals, I will answer
the following research questions: To what extent do Asian
Americans see online as a space for their politics? What
disadvantages does the group face online, both on the
individual and structural-level, and why do such factors
shape discrepancies in Asian Americans’ online political
behavior? Despite having more Internet resources, how
does the proliferation of the Internet contribute to rather
than reduce political inequality for Asian Americans?
I start with an overview of the status of the Asian
American offline political participation gap. Then, I
review the literature which examines the relationship
between Internet usage and political involvement; I note
945391
PRQXXX10.1177/1065912920945391Political Research QuarterlyChan
research-article2020
1University of California, Irvine, USA
Corresponding Author:
Nathan K. Chan, Department of Political Science, University of
California, Irvine, 4184-4198 Pereira Drive, Irvine, CA 92617, USA.
Email: nkchan@uci.edu
Political Inequality in the Digital
World: The Puzzle of Asian American
Political Participation Online
Nathan K. Chan1
Abstract
This paper adds to existing literature by reassessing the racial participation gap after placing online activity within
the repertoire of minorities’ political actions. Even though Asian Americans are the most resourced in terms of
Internet access, I theorize about how individual and structural-level impediments uniquely disadvantage this group
from participating in politics online—widening overall participation disparities. Using data from the 2016 National
Asian American Survey, I find that while the racial participation gap is similar for Latina/os and African Americans
compared to whites, regardless of the activity’s platform either offline or online, disparities magnify solely for Asian
Americans when considering digital modes of political behavior. The paper ends by noting how the Internet may
contribute to rather than solve issues of political inequality across race and discusses distortions in which political
voices are heard or muted offline and online.
Keywords
Asian American politics, online political participation gap, race and ethnicity, political behavior
Article
Chan 883
2 Political Research Quarterly 00(0)
that Asian Americans do not fit in well with previous
explanations and that there needs to be a renewed under-
standing of the overall racial participation gap when
including consideration of e-activities. I, then, propose a
theory which accounts for both individual and structural-
level impediments, which pose unique challenges to
Asian American political participation online. My derived
hypothesis suggests that the Asian American political
participation gap widens when accounting for both online
and offline behavior. Next, I test and find support for this
expectation using the 2016 National Asian American
Survey. While the gap in offline or online participation
between Latina/os and African Americans compared to
whites remains constant, the Asian American-White gap
magnifies when comparing online to offline action. While
Asian Americans are already less active on the ground,
they fall even further behind in their political activity
online. This is even though they access the Internet at the
highest rates. I also empirically assess what mitigates this
racial participation gap online according to the factors I
proposed. This includes noting variation in psychological
political interest, pan-ethnic identification, and recruit-
ment. I conclude by discussing implications for Asian
Americans’ political voice and inequality, particularly in
an era characterized by the use of social media and the
Internet.
The Asian American Political
Participation Gap
The Asian American political participation gap has often
been studied with a comparative frame of reference, look-
ing at their rates of activity relative to other racial groups.
In terms of voter turnout, Asian Americans lag behind
(Krogstad 2014; Leighley and Nagler 2013; Ong and
Nakanishi 1996; Ramakrishnan 2005). In a comprehen-
sive study, Wong et al. (2011, 22) find that in the 2008
presidential election, “Asian Americans tied with Latinos
at 57%, and behind whites at 74% and African Americans
at 77%.” This trend persists with more recent data that
Fraga (2018) presents from the Current Population
Surveys and American National Election Studies.
In line with how Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (1995)
conceptually define political participation as “activity that
has the intent or effect of influencing government action
either directly or indirectly (p. 38),” voting is not the only
mode of action important to consider. Asian Americans
may turn out to vote less often because some may not have
access to the ballot box but “rather than being passive
objects of social forces, Asian American men and women
have been pragmatic and calculating actors who have
adopted a multifaceted style of politics to maximize their
chances of survival and [realizing] their interests” (Lien
2001, xii). Political activities beyond voting, then, are
important to take into account for them. Yet research
shows that this gap also remains across political activities
apart from voting (Lien 2001; Wong et al. 2011).
Scholars have thought about why this disparity persists
across different actions. They argue that socio-demo-
graphic and compositional factors such as differences in
average age, income, and education explain the gap in
political participation between whites and minorities
(Leighley and Nagler 2013; Ramakrishnan 2005;
Schlozman, Verba, and Brady 2013). Related to immigra-
tion status, those born outside of the United States may
also have high information costs to become involved in
politics (Barreto 2005; Frey 2013). Accompanying the
lack of resources to stay politically informed and lack of
language assistance, Asian Americans are often not
recruited into politics in the same manner as other groups.
Particularly in an era of weak institutions (DeSipio 2011),
they may be left out from outreach efforts by the
Democratic or Republican Parties (Kim 2007) and by
other mobilization efforts (Ramírez, Solano, and Wilcox-
Archuleta 2018). García-Castañon et al. (2019) note the
lack of partisan recruitment efforts at influencing minori-
ties’ political involvement, although community-based
organizations serve as alternatives.
While work on Asian American political participation
has grown vastly over the last 20 years (Watanabe 2018),
this literature has heavily focused on offline activities.
Given the time in which she was writing, Lien (2001) is
critical of the notion of cultural docility and political com-
placency that is often stereotyped of Asian Americans
and, as a result, examines voting and non-voting, offline
forms of involvement. Similarly, Wong et al. (2011) uti-
lize a survey of Asian Americans, which includes some
measures of online activities but focus on five participa-
tory activities: voting, campaign donations, contacting
government officials, community activism, and protest-
ing. Some recent scholarship has looked at how Internet
engagement and ethnic media consumption may influence
political action among Asian Americans (García-
Castañon, Rank, and Barreto 2011; Lai 2011). Additionally,
Lai (2018) centralizes the relevance of social media and
“connective action” as crucial for understanding Asian
American politics on Twitter.
With these exceptions, to the best of my knowledge,
looking at online political participation as an outcome
separate from offline action for Asian Americans has
been taken less seriously. Asian American political par-
ticipation is primarily characterized by voting, electoral,
and non-electoral activities. Their participation is also
generally confined to offline spaces even though
Theocharis and Van Deth (2018, 139) emphasize online
modes of action are “creative, expressive, individualized,
and digitally enabled (which) can be classified as parts
of the repertoire of political participation.” Assessing

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT