Policy impact assessment in developing countries using Social Accounting Matrices: The Kenya SAM 2014

AuthorEmanuele Ferrari,Pierre Boulanger,Hasan Dudu,Alfredo José Mainar‐Causapé
Published date01 August 2020
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12667
Date01 August 2020
1128
|
Rev Dev Econ. 2020;24:1128–1149.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rode
Received: 30 November 2018
|
Revised: 19 February 2020
|
Accepted: 22 March 2020
DOI: 10.1111/rode.12667
REGULAR ARTICLE
Policy impact assessment in developing countries
using Social Accounting Matrices: The Kenya SAM
2014
Alfredo JoséMainar-Causapé
|
PierreBoulanger
|
HasanDudu
|
EmanueleFerrari
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2020 The Authors. Review of Development Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
European Commission, Joint Research
Centre, Directorate for Sustainable
Resources, Economics of Agriculture Unit,
Seville, Spain
Correspondence
Alfredo José Mainar-Causapé, European
Commission, Joint Research Centre,
Directorate for Sustainable Resources,
Economics of Agriculture Unit, Expo, C/
Inca Garcilaso 3, 41092 Seville, Spain.
Email: amainar@us.es
Funding information
Directorate-General for International
Cooperation and Development; Joint
Research Centre
Abstract
This paper describes the structure and estimation of a Social
Accounting Matrix (SAM) of Kenya for the year 2014.
Among its specificities, this SAM includes a very high
disaggregation of the agri-food sector and accounts for the
double role of households as producers and consumers.
Accounting for these characteristics is crucial to provide
robust socioeconomic analysis in the context of developing
countries. Indeed, this type of database is valuable to per-
form ex-ante evaluations of economic policies with various
economic models and techniques. In this paper, we present
an application with a linear multiplier analysis (backward
linkages and value chain decomposition). The results show
the capacity of the primary sector in Kenya to generate
value added and employment, with this growth distributed
more intensely in rural households whose main livelihood is
semi-subsistence agriculture.
KEYWORDS
home production for home consumption, Kenyan economy, linear
multisectoral models, Social Accounting Matrices
|
1129
MAINAR-CAUSAPÉ et Al.
1
|
INTRODUCTION
Agriculture is the principal sector of the Kenyan economy, contributing approximately 33% of the
GDP in 2016 (Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2017) and employing around 80% of the national
workforce. About 75% of Kenya's population lives in rural areas (World Bank, 2018) and derives its
livelihood directly or indirectly from agriculture. As a majority of vulnerable groups, such as subsis-
tence farmers (agricultural, livestock, or mixed), depend on agriculture as their main source of liveli-
hood, the development of the agricultural sector is fundamental to any growth and poverty-reduction
strategy.
In African countries (Kenya among them), peasants are producers and factor suppliers of econo-
mies, and therefore a large portion of the workforce (sometimes all of it) is dedicated to the production
of self-consumed commodities. This results in substantial home production for home consumption
(HPHC) that should be accounted for in any economic analysis. These economies include two types
of "productive agents": households as producers of commodities partly for own consumption and
partly for sale on the market and households that produce exclusively market-oriented commodities
(Aragie, 2014). In addition, Kenya comprises households that produce cash crops (e.g., coffee and tea)
exclusively for the market. As a result, a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for Kenya should include
all three types of productive agricultural agents.
In Kenya, the self-consumption of commodities covers a significant proportion of food con-
sumed, especially in rural areas and by households with lower chances of finding off-farm jobs.
HPHC and the double role of households as producers and consumers must be properly considered.
Failure to consider these characteristics and the difference in price formation between self-con-
sumed commodities and marketed products lead to incorrect interpretations of the results of eco-
nomic models aimed at assessing policy impacts, particularly in rural areas (Taylor & Adelman,
2003; Tiberti, 2011).
In June 2008, the Kenyan government launched Kenya Vision 2030 (Government of Kenya,
2008) as the new long-term strategic document for Kenya’s economic and social development, iden-
tifying agriculture as one of the key sectors to deliver a 10% annual economic growth rate. In this
framework, several agricultural policies have been formulated to increase agricultural productivity
and income.1
The development of these policies requires an exhaustive knowledge of the inter-sec-
toral links and transmission mechanisms of the possible shocks generated by economic policies
on output, value added, and employment. This information must also be structured to reflect the
specificities of the country. Thus, a database that enables this multisectoral analysis, based on an ex-
haustive description of the economic flows and allowing the application of informative models and
tools, becomes a very relevant tool. This paper presents a 2014 Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for
Kenya, with a novel specific structure that includes HPHC with a high disaggregation of the agri-
cultural sector and a regional disaggregation of agricultural sectors based on agro-ecological zones
(AEZs). The SAM provides a detailed description of the Kenyan economic structure and serves as
a database for linear multisectoral models and analysis tools. The estimation of linear multipliers
and value chain analyses for output, value added, and employment for the disaggregated primary
sector, distinguishing households as producers (for own consumption and market-oriented) from
normal activities, provides significant information, defining the basic outline of potential results of
the proposed policies.2
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 introduces the concept of SAMs and de-
velops the HPHC issue. Section 3 illustrates the estimation process of the Kenya SAM, and Section 4
shows the multiplier and value chain analyses. Section 5 concludes.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT