Policewomen’s Perceptions of Gender Equity Policies and Initiatives in Australia

AuthorKate Huppatz,Kathy Newton
Date01 December 2020
Published date01 December 2020
DOI10.1177/1557085120937060
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085120937060
Feminist Criminology
2020, Vol. 15(5) 593 –610
© The Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1557085120937060
journals.sagepub.com/home/fcx
Article
Policewomen’s Perceptions
of Gender Equity Policies and
Initiatives in Australia
Kathy Newton1 and Kate Huppatz2
Abstract
This paper explores policewomen’s perceptions of Equal Employment Opportunity
(EEO) initiatives including breastfeeding rooms, part-time and flexible work
arrangements, and gender quotas. Drawing on interviews with 18 Australian
policewomen, our analysis reveals that while policewomen recognize that good
initiatives and policies exist, when workers attempt to access them, they are often
met with resistance and resentment. Policewomen express concerns about quotas,
fearing that they might translate to a loss of respect and credibility for women
workers. Our research aims to create a more nuanced understanding of how EEO
policies are practiced within policing and considers possibilities for future policies.
Keywords
policewomen, policing, gender equality policies, breastfeeding rooms, quotas,
organizations, part-time work
Policewomen are now employed in all aspects of policing in Australia (Prenzler, 2015;
Prenzler et al., 2010). Australia has eight police organizations, and as of June 2018, the
percentage of policewomen in Australia ranged from 23.5% in the Queensland Police
Service (Queensland Police Service, 2018) and the Australian Federal Police
(Australian Federal Police, 2018) to 32% in the Tasmania Police (Department of
Police, Fire and Emergency Management, 2018). Policing continues to be masculin-
ized, in that it is typically seen as dangerous and physical work and therefore aligned
with men’s bodies, however, policewomen have gradually achieved greater horizontal
1School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia
2Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia
Corresponding Author:
Kathy Newton, School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, Second Avenue, Kingswood,
Penrith South, New South Wales 2751, Australia.
Email: k.newton@westernsydney.edu.au
937060FCXXXX10.1177/1557085120937060Feminist CriminologyNewton and Huppatz
research-article2020
594 Feminist Criminology 15(5)
representation right across the varied divisions and duties (Prenzler et al., 2010).
Nevertheless, there are still areas of policing that have become feminized due to their
association with caring, and it is policewomen who mostly occupy these positions.
Women’s vertical representation, that is, promotion to senior and executive ranks, has
been slower to achieve (Prenzler et al., 2010; Prenzler & Sinclair, 2013).
In 2015, the first centennial anniversaries for women in policing were commemo-
rated in the states of New South Wales (NSW) and South Australia (SA), and then in
2017 for Victoria (VIC), Tasmania (TAS) and Western Australia (WA). These land-
marks were honored with much fanfare and media publicity, giving the impression that
policewomen, after a long history of gender discrimination, had finally achieved
equality (Rabe-Hemp, 2008; Silvestri, 2015). However, concurrent with these celebra-
tions, independent reviews into gender equity and sexual harassment were being con-
ducted in the Victoria Police (VicPOL), the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and South
Australian Police (SAPOL). Despite well-established Equal Employment Opportunity
(EEO) policies and initiatives already existing in these organizations, the results
revealed discrimination and high levels of sexual harassment (Broderick, 2016;
Government of South Australia Equal Opportunity Commission, 2016; Victorian
Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission (VEOHRC), 2015). Consequently,
new reforms are being implemented that aim to reduce inequality by enhancing oppor-
tunities for promotion and making part-time work and flexible arrangements more
accessible. These reforms include the introduction of gender quotas for certain posi-
tions whereby a percentage of the posts are allocated to women.
This paper makes use of new empirical research to examine policewomen’s percep-
tions of three different EEO policies and initiatives: breastfeeding rooms in police
stations, access to part-time and flexible work, and the use of gender quotas to ensure
better representation of women in senior positions. These three policies and initiatives
form the focus of this paper as policewomen emphasized their significance when par-
ticipating in a broader study on motherhood and policing careers. Although there is
limited literature on policewomen and pregnancy (see, Cowan & Bochantin, 2009;
Kruger, 2007; Langan et al., 2017, 2019) no research has yet explored the experiences
of policewomen who are still breastfeeding when they return from maternity leave. As
far as we are aware, this article is the first to investigate whether the introduction of
breastfeeding rooms in police stations has been helpful for lactating policewomen.
The paper also adds to existing scholarship on the experiences of policewomen who
access part-time or flexible work arrangements. Finally, the article provides a platform
for policewomen’s views on gender quotas in their workplaces.
Introduction of Equal Employment Opportunities Policies
in Australia
In the 1960s and 1970s laws preventing sex discrimination were enacted across the
states and the Commonwealth of Australia. However, police organizations tended to
ignore the legislation at this time (Prenzler, 2015). This is probably not surprising,
considering that the occupational culture of policing has always had a strong emphasis

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT