Planning for Change

Date01 June 2018
DOI10.1177/0160323X18785695
Published date01 June 2018
Subject MatterGeneral Interests
General Interest
Planning for Change:
Incorporating Contextual
Implementation Design into
Strategic Planning
David Mitchell
1
, Sarah E. Larson
1
, Claudia Colantonio
1
and Christina Nguyen
1
Abstract
Many governments have adopted strategic plans to improve outcomes, but these efforts often fail
because they do not take implementation into consideration as they plan. Past research indicates
that the situational context of a strategic initiative influences implementation success. This study
explores how context influences the relationship between implementation best practices and
success by examining 155 strategic initiatives from 36 U.S. municipalities through a series of multiple
regression analyses. The evidence indicates that context does alter the success rate of implemen-
tation best practices and should be taken into consideration during strategic planning in order to
improve government effectiveness.
Keywords
strategic planning, strategic management, implementation, contingency, public management
The essence of strategic planning is purposeful
change. Strategic organizations differ from
their peers; they anticipate external and internal
influences and defend against and/or take
advantage of these influences. In a time when
faith in the public sector is at historic lows
(Page 2013; Saad 2016) and public resources
grow ever more scarce (Kemp 2012), govern-
ments face an immense imperative to achieve
strategic goals. Consequently, the use of strate-
gic planning is widespread throughout all levels
of the public sector (Bryson 2003; Poister an d
Streib 2005).
Unfortunately, governments that use strate-
gic planning may see little return if plan imple-
mentation goes awry. Strategic failures are
primarily attributed to poor implementation
practices (Walker 2013). Why is this the case?
Changes in economic and political conditions
(Pressman and Wildavsky 1973), a lack of
dedicated implementation resources (Mitchell
2018a), poor project management (Grundy
1998), and organizational resistance (Bryson,
Berry, and Yang 2010) all can derail an
otherwise exemplary strategic plans during
1
School of Public Administration, University of Central
Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
Corresponding Author:
David Mitchell, School of Public Administration,
University of Central Florida, PO Box 161395, Orlando,
FL 32816, USA.
Email: david.mitc hell@ucf.edu
State and Local GovernmentReview
2018, Vol. 50(2) 110-118
ªThe Author(s) 2018
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0160323X18785695
journals.sagepub.com/home/slg

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT