Peter Anderson, Jurgen Rehm, and Robin Room. Impact of Addictive Substances and Behaviours on Individual and Societal Well‐being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. $54.00 pp. 256. ISBN: 9780198714002.
Published date | 01 March 2017 |
Date | 01 March 2017 |
Author | Taleed El‐Sabawi |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.220 |
Book Review
Peter Anderson, Jurgen Rehm, and Robin Room. Impact of Addictive Substances and
Behaviours on Individual and Societal Well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2015. $54.00 pp. 256. ISBN: 9780198714002.
Few public health officials or health practitioners would disagree that the
misuse or overuse of pleasurable substances has resulted in a great deal of social
harm. The disagreement generally occurs in defining the social problem of what
society often refers to as addiction, in deciphering its causal story and in choosing
a policy solution that not only appeals to constituents, but that will be
successfully implemented. Although focusing on discussions of policy solutions
and public health interventions is most common in the public health literature on
addiction, it is truly the causal stories that we tell about the social issue that
influences which policy solutions will be considered (Stone, 1998). In the book,
The Impact of Addictive Substances and Behaviours on Individual and Societal
Well-being, Anderson et. al. explicitly ask the reader to suspend the desire to
define the social problem of illicit substance use as “addiction,” but, instead, to
define the problem as the harm to individual and societal well-being caused by
addictive substances and behaviors. In their compilation of essays, the authors
also challenge common causal stories of deviance, moral failings, and even
biology, with a more complex causal story rooted in historic perspectives, societal
responses, and market forces.
In the literature on addiction, the tendency is to treat addiction as a
dichotomous variable with a number cutoff. If the individual scores above the
cutoff, then he or she suffers from addiction. If not, then he or she is free from the
stigma of being labeled an addict, but, then also doesn’t receive any treatment for
any problem use that falls below the threshold. This also has the consequence of
narrowing “societal attention to the individual level of those engaged in the
behavior, neglecting the fact that the environment in which someone lives is a
major determinant of drug use and harm” (p. vii) and inadvertently excluding
“problem use” by some subpopulations like college students and youth.
In order to combat this tendency, Anderson et. al. ask the reader to define the
societal problem more broadly—as the individual and societal harms caused by
World Medical & Health Policy, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2017
155
1948-4682 #2017 Policy Studies Organization
Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, and 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ.
To continue reading
Request your trial