PERSONAL NEGLIGENCE. DEFENDANT'S VERDICT

Pages12-13
Road when suddenly and without warning the defen-
dant swerved into the plaintiff’s lane of travel,
sideswiping the plaintiff’s vehicle. As a result of the
collision the plaintiff suffered an acoustic concussion
with tinnitus, sensitivity to noise and imbalance issues
along with cervical and thoracic sprain and strain.
The plaintiff maintained that the defendant was negli-
gent in failing to have the vehicle under proper and
adequate control, failing to maintain a single lane,
failing to properly observe and heed traffic conditions
then and there existing, and traveling at an excessive
rate of speed for traffic conditions. The defendant
denied all allegations of negligence and injury and
maintained that the actions of the plaintiff caused or
contributed to the accident and any resulting
damages suffered by the plaintiff.
The board of arbitrators found in favor of the plaintiff
and awarded her $7,000.
REFERENCE
Sara Catanzaro vs. Zoey Alberts. Case no. AR-20-
004986; Panel Arbitration, 10-08-21.
Attorney for plaintiff: Bernard Tully in Pittsburgh, PA.
Attorney for defendant: Mark Martini of Robb
Leonard Mulvihill, LLP in Pittsburgh, PA.
Tractor-Trailer Negligence
DEFENDANT’S VERDICT
Motor vehicle negligence – Tractor-trailer
negligence – Right turn collision – Plaintiff’s
vehicle struck by defendant’s tractor trailer while
making right turn – Back and neck and shoulder
pain.
Allegheny County, PA
In this motor vehicle negligence action, the
plaintiff’s vehicle was struck along the side by the
defendant’s tractor trailer while both were
making a right turn causing the plaintiff to sustain
injury. The defendant denied all allegations of
negligence.
On May 15, 2020, the plaintiff was traveling in his ve-
hicle at the intersection of Yost Boulevard and Brinton
Road in Braddock Hills, Pennsylvania. At the time of
the incident, the plaintiff’s vehicle was stopped at the
aforementioned intersection in the right turn lane. At
the same time, the defendant, operating a tractor
trailer in the scope of his employment, was also
stopped at the subject intersection in the left turn/
straight lane. Upon a green traffic signal, the plaintiff’s
vehicle proceeded to make a right turn. The defen-
dant’s vehicle also began to make a right turn, ille-
gally from the left turn/straight lane. As both vehicles
were turning onto Brinton Road, the defendant’s vehi-
cle struck the plaintiff’s vehicle along the side.
The plaintiff maintained that the defendant was negli-
gent in failing to keep a proper lookout, failing to ex-
ercise due care, failing to remain in the correct lane
of travel, in negligently making a right turn from the
left turn only/straight lane, in failing to turn from the
appropriate lane, failing to maintain a safe distance
from the plaintiff’s vehicle, failing to apply the brakes
in a timely manner, and failing to avoid striking the
plaintiff’s vehicle. Consequently, the plaintiff sustained
injuries, including back pain, neck pain, and shoulder
pain.
The arbitration panel found in favor of the defendant.
REFERENCE
Ronald Gubash vs. Richard Casse, O.T.C. Inc. Case
no. AR-20-003403; Arbitration Panel, 04-09-21.
Attorney for plaintiff: Jepthah M. Orstein of Ainsman
Levine, LLC in Pittsburgh, PA. Attorney for defendant:
Paul R. Robinson of Meyer Darragh Buckler and
Bebenek in Pittsburgh, PA.
PERSONAL NEGLIGENCE
DEFENDANT’S VERDICT
Personal negligence – Plaintiff injured while
helping defendant move large desk at defendant
company’s office – Traumatic brain injury –
Migraine headaches – Aphasia – Post-traumatic
cephalagia.
Montgomery County, PA
In this personal injury action, the plaintiff was
helping the defendant move a desk on the
premises of the defendant’s office when her head
became caught between the desk and the
doorway, causing her to be injured. The
defendants denied all allegations of negligence.
On October 11, 2013, the plaintiff was lawfully on the
premises of her employer’s office, located at 196
Ashland Street in Doylestown, Pennsylvania. At the
time of the incident, the defendant was an em-
ployee of the defendant company, which was leas-
ing an office in the same building as the plaintiff’s
employer. As the defendant was furnishing the office
on the premises, the plaintiff was assisting him in
moving a large desk from a store room into his office.
While moving the desk, the plaintiff and defendant
attempted to move the large desk through a door-
way. As the defendant was pushing the desk through
the doorway, the plaintiff’s head became caught
between the desk and the doorway.
12 VERDICTS BY CATEGORY
Volume 40, Issue 2, January 2022 Subscribe Now

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT