Persistence of cities: Evidence from China

Date01 May 2019
Published date01 May 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12565
AuthorBulent Unel,Fan Duan
REGULAR ARTICLE
Persistence of cities: Evidence from China
Fan Duan
|
Bulent Unel
Department of Economics, Louisiana
State University, Baton Rouge, LA
Correspondence
Bulent Unel, Department of Economics,
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge,
LA 70803.
Email: bunel@lsu.edu
Abstract
Using data from the Qing dynasty, we investigate the
long-run impact of early development on today's living
standards in China. We use city-level population density
in 1776 as a measure of early economic prosperity, and
examine how it is associated with today's development
indicators such as the average night light density, GDP
per capita, average years of schooling, and trade open-
ness. We find that cities which were more prosperous
during the Qing dynasty are now also brighter, richer,
more educated, and more open.
KEYWORDS
China, Qing dynasty, light density, population density, openness,
schooling
1
|
INTRODUCTION
China now has the second largest economy in the world, but living standards vary significantly
across its regions (Unel & Zebregs, 2009). In 2010, for example, the income per capita in
Shanghai was more than five times that of Gansu. Previous studies have mainly focused on
identifying factors that may have driven unequal performance across regions after the reforms
which began in 1978. These factors include reallocation of resources from agriculture to manu-
facturing and services (Brandt, Hsieh, & Zhu, 2008), enterprise restructuring and privatization
(Dong, Putterman, & Unel, 2006; Fisher-Vanden & Jefferson, 2008; Hsieh & Klenow, 2009),
financial reorganization (Yi, 2010), and globalization (Unel & Zebregs, 2009; Sun & Heshmatib,
2010).
These studies, however, have paid limited attention to the fact that living standards differed sig-
nificantly across regions even before the reforms. In 1978, for example, the incom e per capita in
Shanghai was about 3.5 times that of Gansu, suggesting a persistence of cross-regional differences
in living standards. This paper argues that the wide economic differences across regions in China
can be traced to their early developmental levels. More precisely, we use the city-level population
DOI: 10.1111/rode.12565
Rev Dev Econ. 2019;23:663676. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rode © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
|
663

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT