Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association 460 U.S. 37 (1983)

• Author: Kenneth L. Karst
• Pages: 1899-1900

Page 1899

Perry provided the leading modern opinion setting guidelines governing FIRST AMENDMENT claims of access to the PUBLIC FORUM. A school district's collective bargaining agreement with a union (PEA) provided that PEA, but no other union, would have access to the interschool mails and to teacher mailboxes. A rival union (PLEA) sued in federal district court, challenging the constitutionality of its exclusion from the school mails. The district court denied relief, but the court of appeals held that the exclusion violated the EQUAL PROTECTION clause and the First Amendment. The Supreme Court reversed, 5?4, rejecting both claims.

Justice BYRON R. WHITE wrote for the Court, setting out a three-category analysis that set the pattern for later "public forum" cases such as CORNELIUS V. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. (1985). First, the streets and parks are "traditional" public forums, in which government cannot constitutionally forbid all communicative activity. Any exclusion of a speaker from such a traditional public forum based on the content of the speaker's message must be necessary to serve a COMPELLING STATE INTEREST. Content-neutral regulations of the "time, place, and manner" of expression in such places may be enforced

Page 1900

when they are narrowly tailored to serve significant state interests and they leave open "ample alternative channels" of communication.

Second, the state may open up other kinds of public property for use by the public for expressive activity. The state may close such a "designated" public forum, but so long as it remains open it must be made available to all speakers, under the same constitutional guidelines that govern traditional public forums.

Third, communicative uses of public property that is neither a traditional nor a designated public forum may be restricted to those forms of communication that serve the governmental operation to which the property is devoted. The only constitutional limits on such restrictions on speech are that they be reasonable, and that they not be imposed in order to suppress a particular point of view. The Perry case, said Justice White, fit this third category: the school mail system was neither a traditional public forum nor designated for public communicative...