Pentagon attempts to gauge true 'readiness' needs.

AuthorErwin, Sandra I.
PositionUp Front

Under mounting pressure to lower the cost of maintaining weapon systems, the Defense Department has launched an extensive study that seeks to set realistic requirements for weapon readiness and reliability.

Although details on the study are sketchy at best, a senior Pentagon official said the intent is to bring more efficiency into maintenance operations and to challenge an entrenched mentality among the military services that advocates "readiness at any cost."

"It was apparent to me that there is a way to achieve readiness cost effectively, and a way to achieve readiness at any cost," said David V. Pauling, assistant deputy under secretary of defense for maintenance policy, programs and resources.

Pauling took over his current post in June 2004. He is a veteran Defense Department aircraft program manager and a former helicopter pilot in Vietnam.

Secretary Donald Rumsfeld directed Pauling's office to come up with an accurate estimate of the Defense Department's readiness needs, based on the Pentagon strategic guidance to commanders and contingency plans.

The essential question, Pauling asked, is "how many systems do we need to have ready at any given time?"

Ultimately, he said, he hopes the answer to that question will shape the military services' budget priorities. The process of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT