Pension or penitentiary?

AuthorEhrenreich, Barbara
PositionFlip Side

Talk about a cry for help: Timothy J. Bowers robbed a Columbus, Ohio, bank of $80, handed the money over to a security guard, and waited for the police to come and arrest him. In court on October 11, he pleaded guilty and told the judge that he would like a three-year sentence--just enough time to get him to the age of eligibility for full Social Security benefits. The judge graciously obliged, demonstrating compassionate conservatism at its warmhearted best.

Bowers, almost sixty-three years old, is no wacko. He passed a court-ordered psychological exam and explained that he had not been able to find a new job since his old one ended when his employer's company closed in 2003.

"At my age, the jobs available to me are minimum wage jobs," he said, adding, "There is age discrimination out there."

Bowers had hit another kind of "doughnut hole," like the one that plagues Medicare recipients: He was "too old" for the above-minimum-wage workforce and too young for full Social Security. Thanks to rampant age discrimination, "too old" can mean as young as forty-five.

Leaving aside the obvious disadvantages of incarceration--having to pee in public, being unable to send out for pizza, etc.--Bowers made a perfectly rational choice. The minimum wage in Ohio is $5.15 an hour, or $824 a month before taxes, which won't get you much of a dwelling space in Columbus, at least not if you intend to maintain a regular schedule of meals. Prison, on the other hand, offers a free bed, free food, and, however inadequate, free health care. Bowers could have applied for a Section 8 housing voucher, but the waiting list for those exceeds, in some cities, his three-year prison term.

We can expect a rash of similar bank...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT