Penny for Your Thoughts? The Protective Effect of Youths’ Attitudes Against Drug Use in High-Risk Communities

AuthorAbigail A. Fagan,Emily M. Wright,Gillian M. Pinchevsky
Published date01 April 2016
Date01 April 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014562074
Published BySage Publications, Inc.
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Penny for Your Thoughts?
The Protective Effect
of Youths’ Attitudes
Against Drug Use in
High-Risk Communities
Emily M. Wright
1
, Abigail A. Fagan
2
, and Gillian M. Pinchevsky
3
Abstract
Individual-level attitudes about drugs are strong predictors of substance use among adolescents, and
aggregate-level community norms regarding deviancy and drug use may influence youth attitudes as
well as their drug use. This study examined the direct effects of neighborhood norms about deviance,
disadvantage, immigrant concentration, and residential stability on youths’ attitudes about drug harm-
fulness as well as their variety of past month substance use. The moderating effect of community
norms on the relationship between youth attitudes and drug use was also examined. Results suggest
that community norms favorable to deviance and drug use reduced youth’s attitudes that drugs were
harmful. Further, youth’s perceptions of drug harmfulness significantly reduced their substance use in
the past month. Neighborhood concentrated immigration also significantly reduced substance use.
Finally, living in areas where norms were favorable to deviance enhanced the protective effect of
youths’ perceptions. Implications for research and substance use prevention strategies are discussed.
Keywords
drug use, youth attitudes, neighborhood norms
Introduction
Youth attitudes regarding the acceptability and/or harms associated with drug use are important
factors that can impact their substance use (e.g., Donovan, 2004; Hawkins, Catalano, & Miller,
1992; Johnston, O’Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2011). In general, studies indicate an inverse
relationship between intolerance of drug use and actual use, such that youth who believe that
1
School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, USA
2
Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
3
Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA
Corresponding Author:
Emily M. Wright, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska, 6001 Dodge Street, 218 CPACS,
Omaha, NE 68182, USA.
Email: emwright@unomaha.edu
Youth Violence and JuvenileJustice
2016, Vol. 14(2) 110-129
ªThe Author(s) 2014
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1541204014562074
yvj.sagepub.com
substance use is harmful or who disapprove of drugs are less likely to use drugs, while youth who
engage in substance use are more likely to approve of it or believe that it is not harmful (Bachman,
Johnston, & O’Malley, 1998; Bachman, Johnston, O’Malley, & Humphrey, 1988), believe many
of their peers also use drugs (Johnston et al., 2011; Miller-Day & Barnett, 2004; Simons-Morton
et al., 1999), and/or expect positive benefits from its use (Barkin, Smith, & DuRant, 2002; Grube
& Agostinelli, 1999; Simons-Morton et al., 19 99). Recent data suggest that yo uth are likely becom-
ing more tolerant and accepting of substance use, with the percentage of 10th and 12th graders
reporting that alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco are harmful or pose ‘‘great risk’’ declining from
2009 to 2010 (Johnston et al., 2011). For instance, in 2009, 52%of 12th graders reported that
smoking marijuana regularly was very harmful, but only 46%reported similar views in 2010
(Johnston et al., 2011). Additionally, only 25%of 12th graders in 2010 believed that having one
or two drinks (beer, wine, or liquor) nearly every day was very harmful and less than 40%of 8th
graders perceived that smoking up to five cigarettes a day posed a great risk of harm (Johnston
et al., 2011).
These trends emphasize the need to understand how youth’s attitudes affect their substance use.
One somewhat neglected, yet potentially important, area of research is the impact that neighbor-
hood context may have on the development of youth attitudes, as well as the interrelationship
between neighborhood context, individual attitudes, and youth substance use. Relatively few stud-
ies have examined contextual factors that may influence youths’ attitudes about drug use
(Lipperman-Kreda, Grube, & Paschall, 2010; Thrul, Lipperman-Kreda, Grube, & Friend, 2014).
Further, scant research has focused on the contextual factors that may moderate the impact of
individual attitudes regarding substance use, although some studies have examined how context
may interact with individual-level demographic characteristics such as sex or race/ethnicity
(e.g., Lambert, Brown, Phillips, & Ialongo, 2004).
The limited focus on neighborhood context is unfortunate and inhibits our ability to explain
the ecological patterning, or differences across social contexts, of youth substance use and their
attitudes about substance use. For example, while there does appear to be some research to suggest
that substance use varies across neighborhood contexts (Feinberg, Jones, Cleveland, & Greenberg,
2012; Karriker-Jaffe, 2011; Wilcox, 2003), we know much less about why or how neighborhoods
impact substance use than we know about how neighborhoods influence other adolescent prob-
lems (e.g., delinquency). A better understanding of the contextualization of substance use can
help inform prevention and/or intervention efforts designed to reduce substance use, especially
those that can simultaneously address ecological and individual influences on drug use (Fagan
& Hawkins, 2012; Flay, 2000). We expand upon this line of research in this study and examine
the potential for neighborhood factors to influence youths’ perceptions of the harmfulness of drug
use, as well as to moderate the relationship between youths’ attitudes regarding substance use and
their own substance use.
Youth Attitudes and Substance Use
Explanations for the relationship between individual attitudes about drug use and actual engagement
in substance use are plentiful. Social learning theory (Akers, Krohn, Lanza-Kaduce, & Radosevich,
1979) posits that youth w ho are exposed to others who use dru gs or who perceive ( perhaps erro-
neously) that their friends or close acquaintances use drugs are at greater risk for substance use
themselves (Donovan, 2004; Hawkins et al., 1992; Miller-Day & Barnett, 2004; Patel & Fromme,
2010; Thrul et al., 2014). When drug use is modeled, reinforced, and accepted by others in their
peer or intimate groups, youth are more likely to emulate this behavior and/or believe that it is
acceptable and not particularly harmful (Bandura, 1979; Kosterman, Hawkins, Guo, Catalano,
& Abbott, 2000; Zimmerman & Vasquez, 2011). Holding beliefs that drug use is ‘‘okay,’’
Wright et al. 111

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex