Patenting the Output of Autonomously Inventive Machines

AuthorRyan B. Abott
PositionRyan B. Abbott is a professor of law and health sciences at the University of Surrey School of Law in the United Kingdom, and an adjunct assistant professor at David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. He can be reached at r.abbott@surrey.ac.uk. This article is adapted from the author's article 'I Think, ...
Pages18-24
Published in Landslide® magazine, Volume 10, Number 1 , a publication of the ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law (ABA-IPL), ©2017 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This
information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.
Photo: iStockPhoto
A
n innovation revolution is on the horizon. Articial intel
ligence (AI) has been generating inventive output for
decades, and now the continued and exponential
growth in computing power is poised to take creative machines
from novelties to major drivers of economic growth. A creative
singularity in which computers overtake human inventors as
the primary source of new discoveries is foreseeable.
This phenomenon poses new challenges to the traditional
paradigm of patentability. Computers already are generating
patentable subject matter under circumstances in which the
computer, rather than a human inventor, meets the require-
ments to qualify as an inventor (a phenomenon I refer to as
“computational invention”).1 Yet, it is not clear that a computer
could be an inventor or even that a computer’s invention could
be patentable. There is no statute addressing computational
PATENTING THE
OUTPUT OF
AUTONOMOUSLY
INVENTIVE
MACHINES
Ryan B. Abbott is a professor of law and health sciences at the
University of Surrey School of Law in the United Kingdom, and
an adjunct assistant professor at David Geffen School of Medicine
at the University of California, Los Angeles. He can be reached at
r.abbott@surrey.ac.uk. This article is adapted from the author’s
article “I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the
Future of Patent Law,” 57 B.C . L. Rev. 1079 (2016).
By Ryan B. Abbott

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT