Pandemic Planning in the United States: An Examination of COVID‐19 Data
Published date | 01 November 2021 |
Author | Charles E. Menifield,Cal Clark |
Date | 01 November 2021 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13326 |
Research Article
1102 Public Administration Review • November | D ecember 2 021
Abstract: In the early months of 2020, news spread that a coronavirus (COVID-19) had been detected in Wuhan,
China. The virus quickly spread across the country and to other continents. As deaths mounted in the United States,
evidence indicated that some states experienced a higher rate of COVID-19 deaths than other states and that African
American communities were hit harder by the virus than other racial groups. Hence, we pose two questions in this
research: Are COVID-19 deaths spread equally across different states and regions of the United States? Secondly, are
African Americans more likely to die from COVID-19 than other racial groups? Using data from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and APM Research Lab, we show that some states witnessed significant loss
of life due to the virus and that African Americans were more likely to die from the virus when compared with White
residents.
Evidence for Practice
• Governments should collect local and statewide data with the goal of creating protocols to address pandemic
“hotspots.”
• Governments should be more proactive when planning for pandemics. This includes creating
communication plans with other public organizations as well as private, nonprofit, faith-based,
neighborhood, and community organizations.
• Safety nets for those who are predisposed to being impacted the most by pandemics, such as African
Americans, should be created by policymakers.
In 2009, French and Raymond published a paper
that argued that the likelihood of an influenza
pandemic affecting millions of persons was a real
threat and that local government officials should
prepare for this eventuality. During this same time
period, Schnirring (2010), using CDC data, published
a paper that showed African Americans were more
heavily impacted by pandemic H1N1 hospitalizations,
followed by Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and
native populations. Nearly 10 years later, in late
December 2019, French and Raymond’s (2009)
worse-case scenario became a reality when an outbreak
of a previously unknown virus was reported in
Wuhan, China. By March of 2020, the virus had
spread like a tsunami to essentially every corner of the
planet, leaving countless deaths and infections in its
wake. Despite many advances in medicine and recent
history with a pandemic, no one was prepared for the
coronavirus (COVID-19) as it wreaked havoc on an
epic level. In fact, every major facet of our existence
was affected: economy, education, medicine, religion,
and family life. As the number of those impacted by
the virus in the United States has grown, evidence
suggested that certain states and regions were more
impacted than others and that African Americans
were more likely to become infected and die from the
virus than other racial groups (Martin-Howard and
Farmbry 2020). This research is important because
previous research by Nelson (2002) indicated that
racial and ethnic disparities in health care exist even
when factors such as insurance coverage, income, age
and severity of the condition are comparable. If this
is true, only a change in public policy can provide a
remedy for the problem.
Our analysis includes an examination of COVID-19
data for the period Feb 1–May 20, 2020. The goal
of the research is to address two important questions
that have important public policy implications. First,
are COVID-19 deaths spread equally across different
states and regions of the United States? Second, are
African Americans more likely to die from COVID-
19 than other racial groups? Given the existing
inequities in US health care, education, and the
criminal justice system to name a few, the answers to
these questions will provide more evidence to support
the argument that governments are the lone actors
that can bring about health equity in our society.
Charles E. Menifield
Cal Clark
Pandemic Planning in the United States: An Examination of
COVID-19 Data
Rutgers University Newark
Auburn University
Cal Clark is an Emeritus MPA Director
and Alumni Professor of Political Science
at Auburn University. His primary fields of
interest are economic policy, comparative
public policy, and research methods. His
recent books include the co-authored
Challenging Neoliberalism
:
The Economic
Miracles in Chile and Taiwan
(2016),
Preserving Basic U.S. Industries
:
The
Implications of Trumponomics
(2020),
and
Workforce Development
:
The Key to
Prosperity in the 21st Century
(2020).
Email: clarkcm@auburn.edu
Charles E. Menifield is the Dean in the
School of Public Affairs and Administration
at Rutgers University-Newark. His research
interests lie primarily in the areas of
budgeting and financial management,
public health and welfare, and policing. His
most recent articles have appeared in
Public
Administration Review
,
Transport Policy
,
Journal of Public Budgeting
,
Accounting
and Financial Management
,
International
Journal of Public Administration
, and
State
and Local Government Review
.
Email: charles.menifield@rutgers.edu
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 81, Iss. 6, pp. 1102–1109. © 2021 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13326.
To continue reading
Request your trial