Other Recent IRS Private Letter Rulings

Published date01 October 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/npc.30652
Date01 October 2019
Bruce R. Hopkins’ NONPROFIT COUNSEL
8 October 2019 THE LAW OF TAX-EXEMP T ORGANIZATIONS MONTHLY
Bruce R. Hopkins’ Nonpr ofit Counsel DOI:10.10 02/n pc
agent attending a board meeting. (How often does that
happen?)
Information garnered by the IRS at this meeting
included the facts that no amateur athlete is involved,
the organization is the rule-making body only in con-
nection with one of the races, and the organization does
not have any affiliations with youth groups or schools.
This organization does not conduct any workshops,
seminars, or clinics teaching youth about the sport. The
IRS ruled that this entity does not qualify as a charitable
or educational organization (Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201933016).
As to the matter of national or international amateur
sports, the IRS ferreted out these facts: (1) the organiza-
tion does not support an event that is represented in the
Olympic or Pan-American Games, (2) the organization’s
races do not lead to or qualify the competitors for a
national or international championship, (3) the organi-
zation does not have any affiliation with a national or
international association, (4) the athletes participating in
the races do not have to demonstrate a certain level of
talent and achievement in order to receive support from
the organization, (5) the organization does not provide
any intensive daily training, and (6) the organization is
not devoted to improving the performance of a small
group of outstanding athletes. Thus, the IRS ruled that
this entity does not constitute a national or international
amateur sports organization.
For good measure, the IRS ruled that the private ben-
efit doctrine was violated because most of the organiza-
tion’s funds were paid out to its members as prizes. The
IRS noted that the organization’s president won or came
in second in the races. Private inurement or reasonable
distributions? [11.2]
OTHER RECENT IRS PRIVATE
LETTER RULINGS
A trust was held by the IRS to be a qualified settle-
ment fund (Reg. § 1.468B-1(c)). The trust uses its assets
and income to mitigate harm suffered by its beneficiaries
and their citizens. All of the beneficiaries are a state or
a government of a possession of the United States. The
IRS also ruled that this trust is performing an essential
governmental function, and thus that its income is
excludible from gross income (IRC § 115) (Priv. Ltr. Rul.
201930004). [19.22(b)]
It is common for the IRS to issue a ruling declining
to recognize a nonprofit organization as a tax-exempt
entity because it did not provide sufficient support-
ing documentation in and with its application. This
deficiency can give rise to colorful observations by the
agency. Here is an example: “The description you have
provided of your activities is persistently incoherent, full
of gaps and omissions, and lacking in necessary explana-
tory matter, frustrating all attempts to attain an under-
standing of them sufficient to support a determination
that you are operated exclusively for exempt purposes”
(Priv. Ltr. Rul. 201931011). [26.1(b)(i)]
A nonprofit membership corporation was formed
to “activate a diverse and collaborative group of
nonprofit leaders, and to develop them into effec-
tive changemakers to connect and advance the
local community.” This entity advised the IRS that X
percent of its time will be devoted to its members’
professional development, Y percent on “networking
and social events,” and Z percent on advocacy. (The
actual percentages were redacted, probably improperly.)
In a classic example of an analysis of eligibility for tax
exemption on the basis of quantification of activities,
the IRS found that the social activities are “substantial”
and thus declined to recognize exemption (Priv. Ltr. Rul.
201931012). [4.5(c)]
Quote of the Month: “The statutory system govern-
ing unrelated business income and the related tax seem
complex and contain multiple exceptions to the rule
and exceptions to the exceptions” (this from the court
opinion in the Mayo Clinic case (see the first article)). To
which may be added: Not to mention the exceptions to
the exceptions to the exceptions.
Each article in the newsletter on a tax-exempt organizations law topic ends with a citation to the appropriate chapter(s) or
subchapter(s) in Hopkins, The Law of Tax-Exempt Organizations, Twelfth Edition (Wiley, 2019). This is done to provide ready access
to additional and background information concerning these articles. For example, underlying information concerning the first
article in this issue is available in Chapters 4 § 4, 8 § 3(a), and 12 § 3(a) of the book; thus, the citation is referenced as [4.4, 8.3(a),
12.3(a)]. Likewise, each article in the newsletter on a charitable giving law topic ends with a citation to the appropriate chapter(s) or
subchapter(s) in Hopkins, The Tax Law of Charitable Giving, Fifth Edition (Wiley, 2019 cumulative supplement). For example, underly-
ing information concerning the fifth article in this issue is available in Chapter 16 of the book; thus, the citation is referenced as [16].
This newsletter is a stand-alone publication. An inventory of articles in the newsletter since its inception in 1983, and a subject mat-
ter index, as well as an index of the court opinions, IRS revenue rulings and procedures, IRS technical advice memoranda, and IRS
private letter rulings discussed in the newsletter, are available at www.brucerhopkinslaw.com. For those who have the books, the
newsletter also provides monthly updates. Both books are annually supplemented. Questions concerning nonprofit law develop-
ments in general may be sent to brucerhopkins@brucerhopkinslaw.com. Also, a comprehensive summary of nonprofit law is avail-
able in the Bruce R. Hopkins Nonprofit Law Library, an e-book published by Wiley. Follow BRHopkins_NPLaw on Twitter.
The newsletter has a dedicated website. Please visit wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/npc.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT