Open models for patents: Giving patents a new lease on life?

AuthorNatacha Estèves
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12089
Date01 March 2018
Published date01 March 2018
DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12089
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open models for patents: Giving patents a new
lease on life?
Natacha Estèves
Sciences Po Law School, Paris, France
Correspondence
Natacha Estèves, PhD Candidate,
Sciences Po Law School, Paris, France.
Email: natachaesteves@gmail.com;
natacha.esteves@sciencespo.fr
This essay investigates the development of peculiar models
in patents: Open patentlicenses, patent pledges, defensive
patent strategies and the like. Although using patents in an
unconventional way, these models do not dispute the very
existence of patents, but rather the way patents are being
used. These models are not entirely newsome have been
around for over a decadebut seem to find an echo with the
growing criticisms of the broken patent system. These
models might be able to go beyond the pro-patent/against
patent debate, by reconciling exclusive/inclusive mecha-
nisms and eventually reveal the strong plasticity of patents,
offering patents a new lease on life.
KEYWORDS
open patents, patent licenses, patent pledges
1
|
INTRODUCTION
A country without a patent office and good patent laws [is] just a crab and [cant] travel any way but sideways and
backways(Twain, 1889, p. 107). This is a modern 19th century view, expressed vividly by author Mark Twain, of the
relationship between intellectual property (IP) and innovation. Contemplating the current trends in patent law, most
countries have evidently made the choice not to be odd-walking crustaceans only moving sideways and backways, by
adopting strong patent regimes. In line with the traditional incentive theory of IP, this on-going tendency suggests that
patents are understood as the most viable option to foster innovation: a patent is an exclusive right granted to
innovators incentivizing them to innovate. With the transformation of our economies into information-based ones
driven by innovation, the task of expanding, strengthening and harmonizing patent law both at a procedural and
substantial level is deemed crucial. The rationale is invariably the same: patents promote innovation.
Yet, the classical understanding of patents as providing the necessity of having strong exclusive rights to
encourage innovation is slightly tempered and disrupted by the recent development of peculiar models. Open
© 2017 The Authors. The Journal of World Intellectual Property © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2
|
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jwip J World Intellect Prop. 2018;21:214.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT