One Size Doesn’t Fit All: An Exploratory Typological Approach to Understanding Criminal Career Heterogeneity in Intimate Partner Homicide
| Published date | 01 November 2024 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241257604 |
| Author | Olivier Péloquin,Julien Chopin,Francis Fortin,Jean-Pierre Guay,Eric Chartrand,Sarah Paquette |
| Date | 01 November 2024 |
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2024, Vol. 51, No. 11, November 2024, 1734 –1754.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241257604
Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions
© 2024 International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology
1734
ONE SIZE DOESN’T FIT ALL
An Exploratory Typological Approach to
Understanding Criminal Career Heterogeneity in
Intimate Partner Homicide
OLIVIER PÉLOQUIN
University of Montreal
JULIEN CHOPIN
University of Lausanne
Simon Fraser University
Laval University
FRANCIS FORTIN
JEAN-PIERRE GUAY
University of Montreal
ERIC CHARTRAND
Sûreté du Québec
SARAH PAQUETTE
University of Portsmouth
Approximately one in seven homicides globally is committed by a partner within an intimate relationship. While criminology
research on intimate partner homicide (IPH) perpetrators is extensive, their interactions with law enforcement remain under-
explored. This study examines the criminal trajectories of IPH perpetrators to ascertain whether they exhibit common or
diverse patterns. Utilizing data from Quebec’s official criminal events database, the study analyzes variables concerning the
criminal histories of 1,780 individuals involved in attempted or completed IPH through latent profile analysis. Findings
indicate five distinct profiles among IPH perpetrators: one-time, low-volume intimate partner violence (IPV), moderate-
volume IPV, high-volume violence, and high-volume polymorphous perpetrators. The external validity of these profiles is
assessed using additional criminal career, contextual, and situational variables. Implications for the justice system’s practices
and challenges are also discussed.
Keywords: intimate partner homicide; criminal career; latent profile analysis; heterogeneity; trajectories
AUTHORS’ NOTE: This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
(SSHRC)—Insight Development Grants—[#430-2022-0036]. Correspondence concerning this article should
be addressed to Julien Chopin, School of Criminal Justice, University of Lausanne, 1016 Lausanne,
Switzerland; e-mail: julien.chopin@unil.ch.
1257604CJBXXX10.1177/00938548241257604Criminal Justice and BehaviorPéloquin et al. / Criminal Career Heterogeneity in IPH
research-article2024
Péloquin et al. / CRIMINAL CAREER HETEROGENEITY IN IPH 1735
INTRODUCTION
In 2018, an intimate partner was found responsible for one out of every five solved homi-
cides in Canada (Roy & Marcellus, 2019). In the same year, police organizations reported
1,060 homicides or attempted homicides between intimate partners (Conroy et al., 2019).
Homicide is the most severe crime in the Canadian Criminal Code and more specifically,
intimate partner homicide (IPH), can be associated with the suicide of the perpetrator as well
as the deaths of children or other family members. Any homicide poses a significant cost to
society: In 2014, homicide cost the Canadian Justice System, on average, US$371,514.25
per case (Gabor, 2015). Despite solid groundwork by researchers, much work remains to be
done to better understand IPH perpetrators. Only a few studies have used a typological
approach to consider heterogeneity in the criminal careers of individuals who commit IPH
(Dixon et al., 2008; Kivisto, 2015; Vignola-Lévesque & Léveillée, 2021). These previous
studies, while suggesting that there are different categories of IPH perpetrators, are limited
by the nature of the data used: Researchers were mainly interested in the psychological
aspects of IPH perpetrators, and their samples were therefore drawn from forensic psychia-
try. Beyond the obvious problem of sample size, these studies examined only IPH perpetra-
tors who presented with mental disorders and required psychological intervention. This
limitation has created a significant knowledge gap for police attempting to understand IPH
perpetrators with a criminal trajectory lens, as no previous study has looked at IPH perpetra-
tors in terms of other criminal activities. The study of criminal careers, an important area of
criminological research, makes it possible to better understand and predict criminal recidi-
vism (e.g., Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990). A wealth of evidence from studies using represen-
tative official data of the criminal careers of those involved in intimate partner violence
(intimate partner violence perpetrators) strongly shows that incidences of physical violence
involving a partner often occur more than once, rather than one-off, (Hilton & Eke, 2016;
Tanskanen & Aaltonen, 2022) and that two-thirds of IPVO had a criminal career prior to
committing their first act of intimate partner violence (Hilton & Eke, 2016).
The issue of IPH has received very little attention and, while general trends suggest that
perpetrators who kill their partners have longer criminal careers than perpetrators whose
attacks do not lead to death (Campbell et al., 2017; Dobash et al., 2004; Eriksson et al.,
2019), determining the validity of this view requires a better understanding of how the crimi-
nal careers of those involved in IPH are organized and articulated. Also, most of the time,
official judicial system data is the sole known reference point for an individual prior to inter-
vention by law enforcement agencies, who often serve as a first-line response in many cases.
Hence, it is crucial to endeavor to discern the diverse criminal career trajectories that culmi-
nate in IPH because it helps identify intervention points and risk factors across an individu-
al’s life that could lead to IPH. Understanding these trajectories allows for the development
of specific prevention strategies and contributes to a deeper theoretical understanding of IPH
by considering the longitudinal interplay of life experiences and criminal behavior. This
approach not only aids in crafting evidence-based interventions but also enhances our theo-
retical models, providing a comprehensive view of the factors contributing to IPH. Ultimately,
this perspective is vital for developing proactive and holistic approaches to prevent intimate
partner violence and homicide. Consequently, this study examines the criminal career pat-
terns of individuals involved in IPH (both attempted and completed) to determine if the paths
associated with IPH are homogeneous or heterogeneous.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting